期刊文献+

血清肝纤维化指标在临床中的应用评价 被引量:2

The value of clinical application of serum hepatic fibrosis indices
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:运用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价肝纤维化指标在慢性肝病中的应用价值。方法:对145例肝病患者血清肝纤维化指标进行检测并采用ROC曲线评价其诊断效率。结果:慢性肝炎与急性肝炎鉴别的单项指标HA、PCⅢ、LN、Ⅳ.C的灵敏度和特异度分别为:46%~56%和72%~86%,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.621~0.730;而肝硬化与慢性肝炎鉴别的单项指标灵敏度和特异度分别为:50%~71%和79%~91%;ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.633~0.874;6种联合模式平行试验的灵敏度为84.4%~97.2%,特异度为55.6%~81.9%;其中,4项联合指标的阴性似然比为0.05;而第6种联合模式序列试验的灵敏度为13.4%~45.5%,特异度为97.7%~99.9%,阳性似然比均>10。结论:4项联合指标的平行试验可作为排除肝硬化的诊断试验,第6种联合模式序列试验可作为判断肝硬化的较好指标。 Objective: To evaluate the application value of hepatic fibrosis indices in the chronic liver disease with ROC curve analysis.Methods:Hepatic fibrosis indices in 145 patients with liver diseases were detected,and the diagnostic efficiency was evaluated with ROC curve.Results:The sensitivity and specificity of differential event index of HA,PCⅢ,LN and Ⅳ.C in acute hepatitis and chronic hepatitis were 46%~56% and 72%~86%,AUC-ROC was 0.621-0.730;and that of liver cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis were 50%~71% and 79%~91%,AUC-ROC was 0.633-0.874.The sensitivity of six federated models parallel test were 84.4%~97.2%,and the specificity were 55.6%~81.9%,and the negative likelihood ratio of four indices was 0.05;and the sensitivity and specificity of six federated models array test were 13.4%~45.5% and 97.7%~99.9%,and the positive likelihood ratio was 10.Conclusion: The parallel test of four indices can be the diagnostic test to differentiate the live cirrhosis,and the sixth federated models array test can be more useful indicators to judge liver cirrhosis.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 北大核心 2012年第3期527-529,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 肝硬化 ROC曲线 联合检测 阴性似然比 阳性似然比 Liver cirrhosis ROC curve Joint detection Negative likelihood ratio Positive likelihood ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1[1]Jacobs DS,DeMott WR,Oxley DK.Laboratory test handbook concise Ⅱ[M].5th ed.Hudson,Ohio:Lexi-Comp,2004:1213.
  • 2[2]Goldman L,Ausiello D.Cecil Textbook of Medicine[M].22nd ed.Philadelphia:Saunders,2004:412,978,1131.
  • 3[3]Sacks DB,Bruns DE,Goldstein DE,et al.Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus[J].Clin Chem,2002,48(3):436-472.
  • 4[4]NACB:Laboratory Guidelines for Evidence-Based Practice for POCT Logistics-Draft Guidelines 1 -Occult Blood Testing[EB/OL].(2005-01-26)[2006-03-10].http://www.nacb.org/lmpg/poct/chp9_occult_blood.pdf
  • 5[7]Wallach J.Interpretation of diagnostic tests[M].6th ed.Boston:Little,Brown and Company,1996:154-155.
  • 6[8]Tietz NW.Clinical guide to laboratory tests[M].3rd ed.Philadelphia:W.B.Saunders Company,1996:452-453,1053-1054.
  • 7[9]Desai SP.Clinician's guide to laboratory medicine-pocket[M].Hudson:Lexi Comp Incop,2004:193-224.
  • 8[10]Dufour DR,Lott JA,Nolte FS.Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic injury.Ⅱ.Recommendations for use of laboratory tests in screening,diagnosis,and monitoring[J].Clin Chem,2000,46(12):2050-2068.
  • 9[11]Dufour DR,Lott JA,Nolte FS.Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic injury.Ⅰ.Performance characteristics of laboratory tests[J].Clin Chem,2000,46(12):2027-2049.
  • 10Wieand HS, Gail MH, james BR, et al. A family of nonparametric statistics for comparing diagnostic markers with paired or unpaired data.Biometrika. 1989.76 : 585-592.

共引文献14031

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部