期刊文献+

“非人称”范畴的汉语视角 被引量:8

Impersonality from Sinitic Perspectives
原文传递
导出
摘要 语言中普遍存在着主语或施事的显著性受到弱化的"非人称"现象,但这一现象在具体语言中的内在机制和表现形式却不尽相同。注重语法和语义关系的语言一般通过格、一致等形态句法手段来反映非典型主语或施事特征;而注重语用关系的汉语则可在"语用优先"的原则下,形成特殊句子成分排列,从而弱化语法或语义关系特征。汉语的这一特色让我们领略到一种与众不同的"非人称"现象。 Impersonality, in the sense that Subject or Agent Prominence can be diminished, is prevalent among languages. Yet the internal mechanisms and formal realizations are far from identical. For languages which attach much importance to GRs (grammatical relations ) or SRs (semantic roles ), atypical Subject or Agent properties are generally discernible through case marking, indexation or other morphosyntactic means, but for Sinitic languages, which attach more importance to PRs (pragmatic relations ), impersonality can be prompted through some pragmatically-oriented constructions, where PRs exceed GRs or SRs in alignment of syntactic constituents. Such characteristics enable us to distinguish some Sinitc types of impersonality from those previously known.
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期30-37,共8页 Journal of Foreign Languages
基金 法国高等社会科学院Sino-type项目(ERC Advanced Grant 230388)的支持
关键词 类型学 非人称 主语 施事 话题 typology impersonal subject agent topic
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Cain, B. D. & Gair, J. W. Dhivehi (Maldivian) [ M ]. Mtinchen/Newcasfle: Lincom, 2000.
  • 2Clamons, R., Mulkem, A., Sanders, G. & Stenson, N. The limits of formal analysis: prag- matic motivation in Oromo grammar [ A. M. Dar- nell et. al. Functionalism and Formalism in Lin- guistics, vol. 2. Case studies [ C 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999.59 - 77.
  • 3Cone, Bernard. Language Universa & Lingu- tic Typology (2nd. Ed. ) M. Chicago: The Uni-versity of Chicago Press, 1989.
  • 4Giv6n,Talmy. Topic, pronoun and grammatical a- greement [ A ]. Li, C. N. Subject and Topic [ C ]. New York : Academic Press, 1976. 149 - 188.
  • 5Giv6n, Talmy. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. 2 [ M ]. Amsterdam: John Ben- jamins ,2001.
  • 6Gundel, Jeanette K. Universals of topic-comment structure [A]. Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E. & Wirth,J. Studies in linguistic typology [ C]. Am- sterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1988. 209 - 239.
  • 7Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Maria Vilkuna. Imper- sonal is personal: Finish perspective [J]. Trans- actions of the Philological Society. 2008, ( 106. 2) :216 -245.
  • 8Keenan, E. L. Towards a universal definition of subject[A]. Li, C. N. Subject and Topic [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1976.303 - 334.
  • 9I.ambrecht, Knud. Information Structure and Sen- tence Form [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1994.
  • 10Lasard, G. Actancy [ M ]. Berlin/New York : Mou- ton de Gruyter,1998.

二级参考文献97

共引文献592

同被引文献58

  • 1刘丹青.汉语类指成分的语义属性和句法属性[J].中国语文,2002(5):411-422. 被引量:243
  • 2方梅.指示词“这”和“那”在北京话中的语法化[J].中国语文,2002(4):343-356. 被引量:253
  • 3董秀芳.现代汉语口语中的傀儡主语“他”[J].语言教学与研究,2005(5):22-27. 被引量:15
  • 4Siewierska Anna. Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject - centered vs. agent - centeredperspeetive [ J ]. Transactions of the Philological Society (Special issue Impersonal Constructions in Grammatical Theory) ,2008, (2).
  • 5Hopper Paul, Thompson Sandra. Transitivity in grammar and dis- course[J]. Language,1980, (56).
  • 6Keenan, E.L. Towards a universal definition of subject [ A . C. N. Li. Subject and Topic [ C 3. New York : Academic Press, 1976. 303 - 334.
  • 7Langacker, R. W. On the subject of impersonals [ A]. M. Brdar et al. Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion [C]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2011. 179-217.
  • 8Malchukov, A. & A. Siewierska. Impersonal Constructions: Cross-linguistic Perspectives [ C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
  • 9Siewierska, A. Impersonalization: an agent-based vs. a subject-based perspective [ J]. Transactions of the Philological Society , 2008, (2) : 115 -137.
  • 10埃德尔曼,托诺尼.2004,《意识的宇宙--物质如何转变为精神》(顾凡及译),上海:上海科学技术出版社.

引证文献8

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部