期刊文献+

泉港区水田土壤养分现状分析

The analysis of paddy soil nutrient status in Quangang district
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对泉港区566个水田土壤样品进行养分测试与分析,结果表明:土壤有机质平均含量23.08 g/kg,83.57%的样品处于中低水平;碱解氮含量平均为115.11 mg/kg,95.05%样品的含量处于中等及缺乏水平;有效磷含量平均为14.82 mg/kg,处于缺乏水平的样品占54.06%;速效钾含量平均为61.73 mg/kg,81.27%的土样钾含量处于缺乏水平;土壤pH值偏低,81.62%的土样处于微酸性至强酸性水平。 The soil nutrient were tested and analyzed by collecting 566 samples of paddy soils in Quangang district.The results showed that the average contents of organic matter was 23.08 g/kg,83.57% of the samples were in a middle and low level;the alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content of paddy soil was 115.11 mg/kg,95.05% of the samples were in a middle and absent level;the available phosphorous content was 14.82 mg/kg,54.06% of the samples were at absent level;the available potassium content was 61.73 mg/kg,81.27% of the samples were at absent level;the value of pH was in a low level,81.62% of the samples were at acidic to strong acid level;each type of the soil nutrient content was slightly different.At present,paddy soil fertility of Quangang distcict overall was low,medium low level of organic matter,low nitrogen,low phospho rus and low potassium level.
出处 《福建农业科技》 2012年第2期43-46,共4页 Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology
关键词 泉港区 土壤养分 水田 Quangang district soil nutrient paddy field
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1LIU Shenghe, Sylvia Prielei, LI Xiubin(1. Inst. of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China,2. International Institute for Applied System Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria).Spatial patterns of urban land use growth in Beijing[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2002,12(3):266-274. 被引量:17
  • 2[27]Bob Crabtree, Neil Bayfild. 1998. Developing sustainability indicators for mountain ecosystems:a Study of the Calrngorrns, Scotland[ J ]. J . Environ. Man., 52:1 ~ 14.
  • 3[28]Bole JB, Pittman UJ. 1976. Sampling Southern Alberta Soils for N and P soil testing[J]. Can .J. Soil Sci. ,56:531~535.
  • 4[29]Carter MR, Gregorich EG, et al. 1997. Concept of soil quality and their significance[A]. In: Soil Quality for Crop Production and Ecosystem Health [ C]. Amstcrcham, Netherland: Elsevier Science Publishers., 124~ 137.
  • 5[30]Cipra JE, Bidwell OW, Whitney DA, et al. 1972. Variations with distance in selected fertility measurements of pedons of western Kansas Ustoll[J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer . Proc., 36:111~ 115.
  • 6[31]Damanski J. 1975. Concept, objectives and structure of the Canada soil information system Canadian[J] .J. Soil. Sci., 55:181~187.
  • 7[32]Edward CJ, Laura LL. 1999. A soil-quality index and its relationship to efficiency and productivity growth measures: Two decompositions[J]. Amer . J . Agric . Ecol., 81: 881 ~ 893.
  • 8[33]FAO. 1976. A Framework for Land evaluation[R]. FAO Soils Bulletin 32. FAO. Rome, Italy.
  • 9[34]Doran JW, Parkin TB. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality [A]. In: Doran JW. eds. Defining Soil Quality for A Sustainable Environment[ C]. Madison Wisconsin: SSSA Special Publication,(35),3~21.
  • 10[35]Doran JW, Jonea AJ. eds. 1996. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality[ C ]. Madison Wisconsin: SSSA Publication, (49). 7 ~ 51.

共引文献318

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部