摘要
关于隐逸思想,许多学者已经对它的产生、发展和流变都作过细致考察和研究,从而出现了许多研究的著作和论文。然而,关于隐逸思想的研究在趋向于深入的同时,尚存在着一些不足:存在着对隐逸、隐逸思想、隐逸文化三个概念的互相混淆使用;多数是从文学角度出发,从而使研究的史学色彩较为匮乏;研究往往集中于隐士这一特定群体,限制了思想史研究的范围;过多地把隐逸与政治隔离开来进行研究,缺乏对隐逸思想的社会现实原因的解析,等等。这些都为我们继续努力留下了广阔的空间。
With regard to the hermit thought,many scholars have carefully examined and studied its production,development and change;thereby have issued many works and articles about it.However,at the same time of gradually deepening studies,there still exist some deficiencies:such as the confused applications of the concepts of hermit,hermit thought and hermit culture;most studies start from the literature angles,thereby lack of the historic colors;the studies often center at the hermit groups thus limit them in the scope of the thought history;pay over attention to the hermit and politics respectively,thus lack of the analysis of the social reasons for the appearance of the hermit thought,etc.;which leave us wide spaces for continuously hard studying them.
出处
《黄河科技大学学报》
2012年第2期49-53,共5页
Journal of Huanghe S&T University
关键词
士人
仕
隐士
隐逸思想
Scholar-bureaucrat
being an official
hermit
hermit thought