期刊文献+

基于脉冲漏磁检测原理的缺陷分类识别技术 被引量:3

Classification recognition technique of defects based on pulse magnetic flux leakage testing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 脉冲漏磁检测是一种快速发展的无损检测方法,而相应的缺陷分类识别是缺陷检测与评估中的关键步骤之一.在介绍脉冲漏磁检测原理的基础上,设计了新型传感器,对不同类型缺陷的标准试件进行了测试;通过对缺陷瞬态差分信号的时、频域特性进行分析,提取了峰值、过零时间以及频谱中一特定频率点的幅值作为特征量对缺陷进行分类识别.实验结果表明该方法可对10 mm钢板表面以及下表面缺陷进行有效的分类识别. Pulsed magnetic flux leakage(PMFL) testing is an emerging and effective electromagnetic non-destructive testing technique,and the defect classification is a key step to defect detection and evaluation.A new PMFL sensor was designed based on the principle of pulsed magnetic flux leakage testing,and the different types of the defects of standard samples were detected.The peak values,zero-crossing time and the amplitude at some frequency in frequency spectrum were selected as characteristic parameters for the classification recognition of defects through the characteristic analysis of the transient differential signals in time domain and frequency domain.Experiment results show that the proposed defect classification recognition method based on pulsed magnetic flux leakage testing is effective to different types of the surface defects in steel plate specimen of 10 mm thickness.
出处 《西安石油大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第2期80-85,122,共6页 Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 河北省自然科学基金(编号:E2008001258)
关键词 脉冲漏磁检测 缺陷分类识别 频谱分析 传感器 PMFL testing classification recognition of defect frequency spectrum analysis sensor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1唐莺,郭希玲,潘孟春,陈棣湘.不同参量对缺陷交变漏磁场影响的仿真及验证[J].无损检测,2008,30(9):577-579. 被引量:4
  • 2杨宾峰,罗飞路,曹雄恒,徐晓杰.脉冲涡流腐蚀成像阵列传感器应用研究[J].传感技术学报,2005,18(1):112-115. 被引量:14
  • 3幸玲玲.用时域有限元边界元耦合法计算三维瞬态涡流场[J].中国电机工程学报,2005,25(19):131-134. 被引量:10
  • 4杨宾峰,罗飞路,张玉华,曹雄恒.飞机多层结构中裂纹的定量检测及分类识别[J].机械工程学报,2006,42(2):63-67. 被引量:36
  • 5Peter J S. Nondestructive Evaluation: Theory, Techniques, and Applications[M]. NewYork: Marcel Dekker, 2002: 352-355.
  • 6Lepine B A, Giguere J S R, Forsyth D S, et al. Interpretation of pulsed eddy current signals for locating and quantifying metal loss in thin skin lap splices[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings-Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 2002(615): 415-422.
  • 7Tian G Y, Sophian A, Taylor D, et al. Multiple sensors on pulsed eddy-current detection for 3D subsurface crack assessment[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2005, 5(1): 90-96.
  • 8Krause H J, Panaitov G I, non-destructive evaluation SQUID magnetometer[J] Superconductivity, 2003, Zhang Y. Conductivity tomography for using pulsed eddy current with HTS ~ IEEE Transactions on Applied 13(2): 215-218.
  • 9Bowler J, Johnson M. Pulsed eddy-current response to a conducting half-space[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1997, 33(3) : 2258-2264.
  • 10Haan V O, Jong P A, Analytical expressions for transient induction voltage in a receiving coil due to a coaxial transmitting coil over a conductingplate[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2004, 40(2): 371-378.

共引文献39

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部