期刊文献+

家族企业更具有长期导向吗?——基于家族控制与传承意愿的实证检验 被引量:14

Are Family Enterprises More Long-term Oriented?——An Empirical Study of Family Control and Succession Intention Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期导向经常被认为是家族企业取得卓越绩效的重要解释,但实证支持不多。从跨时决策和跨代创业视角对家族控制企业的长期导向行为进行检验,并对家族传承意愿在其间的影响进行分析,结果发现,家族控制总体上会显著促进企业慈善捐赠这一长期导向的行为,而对研发投入力度并无影响。进一步对不同家族传承意愿分组的检验显示,家族控制的长期价值视野的运用是有条件的。在意图家族传承的企业中,这一机制才发挥正向的作用,而当家族传承意愿缺失时,家族控制更多表现出非长期导向的行为倾向。 Long-term orientation is always regarded as an important explanation of family enterprises' superior performance even though with little empirical support.Based on the inter-temporal decision and transgenerational entrepreneurship perspectives,this study analyzes the long-term orientation behaviors of family controlled enterprises and examines the contingency effect of family succession intention.The result shows that family control helps improve enterprises' charity donation,but has no impact on long-term behaviors such as research and development investment.Subgroup analysis further reveals that the long-term value of family control is conditional.Family control is more positively related to long-term oriented behaviors in enterprises with intention to pass on to the next generation than those without this intention.Moreover,family control in enterprises without family succession intention behaves more short-term oriented.
作者 宋丽红
出处 《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期88-94,共7页 Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"控制权结构 家族创业与企业价值"(71172167) 中山大学"985工程"三期项目"中国家族企业研究创新基地" 中山大学2011年度笹川基金博士生重要创新项目的研究成果 广东省高等学校高层次人才珠江学者项目
关键词 家族企业 长期导向 家族控制 家族传承 family enterprise long-term orientation family control succession intention
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献45

  • 1叶瑛,姜彦福.论创业研究与战略管理研究的相互关系[J].中国软科学,2004(12):50-57. 被引量:12
  • 2袁界平,吴忠.创业新概念:战略视角下的创业行为[J].经济体制改革,2006(6):60-63. 被引量:5
  • 3Aldrich H. E., Wiedenmayer G., 1993, “From Traits to Rates: An Ecological Perspective on Organizational Foundings”, In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 1 Katz JA, Brockhaus RH (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; pp.145-195.
  • 4Baum J.A.C., Oliver C., 1996, "Toward An Institutional Ecology of Organizational Founding", Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp.1378-1427.
  • 5Chua J. H., Chrisman J. J., Sharma P., 1999, "Defining the Family Business by Behavior", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), pp.19-39.
  • 6Churchill, N. C. and Muzyka, D. F., 1994, “Entrepreneurial Management: A Converging Theory for Large and Small Enterprises”, CORE Working Papers and Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research.
  • 7Clark, William Roberts, 1998, “Agents and Structures: Two Views of Preferences, Two Views of Institutions”,International Studies Quarterly, 42, pp. 245-270.
  • 8Cohen, B. D. & Dean, T. J., 2005,“Information Asymmetry and Investor Valuation of IPOs: Top Management Team Legitimacy as a Capital Market Signal”, Strategic Management Journal, 26, pp. 683-690.
  • 9Cooper A. C., 2001, "Networks, Alliances and Entrepreneurship",In Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating A New Integrated Mindset. Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, Sexton DL (Eds.). Blaekwell: Oxford, UK.
  • 10Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D., Mayer R. C., Tan H. H., 2000, “The Trusted General Manager and Business Unit Performance: Empirical Evidence of A Competitive Advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5), pp. 563-576.

共引文献116

同被引文献235

引证文献14

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部