期刊文献+

证明妨碍及其规制对策

The Obstruction of Evidence and Its Regulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在民事诉讼实务中,由于民事行为的相互性,证明事实真相的证据由一方当事人或第三人加以控制的情形时有发生,从而使证据持有者基于自身利益的考虑,以作为或不作为的方式对证据的提出进行妨碍的行为层出不穷。此种行为严重违背了民事诉讼中的诚实信用原则和公平正义原则,侵害了他人的诉讼利益,应当予以规制。文章通过对民事诉讼中的证明妨碍问题进行理论分析,并提出相应的规制对策,如适用强制措施、推定主张成立、证明责任倒置等制度,试图有效减轻证明妨碍对诉讼的不利影响。 In the civil litigation practice, the evidence of truth is often provided by one party or controlled by the third person due to the mutuality of civil action. Therefore, there are a lot of inter- fernces to the evidence from the evidence holders based on their own interests, intendedly or unintend- edly. This kind of behavior has seriously violated the principle of honesty and the principle of fairness and justice in the civil litigation, the paper puts forward some regulatory countermeasures, such as the application of compulsory measures, presumed claims, and inverted burden of proof system, which can efficiently reduce the adverse effects in the problem of obstruction to testimony.
作者 孙晶
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《安徽职业技术学院学报》 2012年第1期46-50,共5页 Journal of Anhui Vocational & Technical College
关键词 证明妨碍 规制 对策 the obstruction of evidence regulation countermeasure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1骆永家.证明妨碍[J]月旦法学杂志(台湾),2001(02):69.
  • 2黄国昌.民事诉讼理论之新展开[M]台北:元照出版有限公司,2005236.
  • 3高桥宏志;林剑锋.民事诉讼法--制度与理论的深层分析[M]北京:法律出版社,2004466.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部