摘要
郭店M1年代问题一直是学术界关注和争议的热点,其分歧主要存在于考古学者和思想史研究学者之间。这其中的一个主要原因,是考古学者判断墓葬在战国晚期偏早之前的类型学方法往往不为思想史学者所接受。本文尝试从一般性的社会背景出发,讨论思想史学者质疑点的问题所在,同时,将郭店M1的年代,放在白起拔郢前后的社会背景中考虑。
The date of Guodian tomb M1 has been a debatable issue between archaeologists and philosophic researchers.,The problem is that the typological method on analyzing funeral goods that are advocated by archaeologists,who consider the date of the tomb should be placed early of Late Warring state is not accepted by philosophic researchers.This paperre-visits this dating issue by taking a different perspective from social background to answer the inquiries from philosophic researchers.This study considers the date of Guodian Tomb M1 should be closer to the time of alls in Capital Ying by the General Bai Qi.
出处
《江汉考古》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期61-69,共9页
Jianghan Archaeology