期刊文献+

心理因素对质子泵抑制剂维持治疗老年非糜烂性反流病患者生活质量的影响 被引量:8

Effects of psychological factors on quality of life in aged patients with non-erosive reflux disease undermaintenance treatment of proton pump inhibitors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨心理因素对质子泵抑制剂维持治疗的老年非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者生活质量的影响。方法选择我院已确诊且用质子泵抑制剂(埃索美拉唑)维持治疗半年以上老年NERD患者76例,根据临床症状,参照反流性疾病问卷,将76例患者分为有症状组和无症状组,分别对两组患者进行Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)和Zung抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分,并同时用胃食管反流病相关生活质量量表(GERD-HRQL)和SF-36健康量表评估患者生活质量。结果与无症状组及健康对照组比较,有症状组SAS、SDS评分明显升高(P〈0.05),GERD-HRQL评分增高(y。:19.689,P%0.01),SF-36除生理功能外的其他7个健康维度评分明显降低(P%0.05)。相关分析发现,有症状组sAS、SDS得分与GERD-HRQL评分呈正相关(P〈0.01),与SF-36除生理功能外的其他7个健康维度评分呈负相关(P〈O.05)。结论质子泵抑制剂疗效差的老年NERD患者,多数合并心理问题,生活质量明显下降;老年NERD患者心理异常与生活质量下降明显相关。 Objective To explore the effects of psychologicM disorders on qualityoflife of elderly patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) under maintenance treatment of proton pump inhibitors (PPls). Methods A total of 76 elderly patients with NERD treated by proton pump inhibitors (maintenance treatment of Esomeprazole over half a year) were enrolled. They were classified into symptom group aged (66.5±8.2) years (n=35) and symptom group aged(68.2±6.9) years (n=41) according to reflux symptoms, with 20 healthy people aged (65.4± 8.8) years as control. The subjects completed the questionnaires on psychological status including self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) and their quality of life was evaluated by gastroesophageal heath related quality-of-life instrument(GERD-HROL) and medical outcomes study short form(SF-36). Results Scores of SAS and SDS were significantly higher in symptom group (54.9+6.2, 57.9+8.6) than in symptomless(37.9±8.7, 42.7±7.9) and health control group (38.9±7.2, 43.1±8.9), all (P〈0.05), but there was no difference between symptomless and health control group. The rates of anxiety and depression in symptom group (51.4%, 57.1%) were increased as compared with symptomless (12.2%, 9.8%)and health control group(0.0%, 5.0%). Scores of GERD-HRQL in symptom group were higher than in symptomless group (21.4± 5.0 vs. 4.5±2.2, t = 19.76, P% O. 01) while the indexes such as body pain, vitality, social function, affection, mental and whole health in score of SF-36 besides physiology function were lower in symptom group than in symptomless and control groups (P〈0.05 or P%0.01). Only the significant differences in mental and whole health of SF-36 were found between symptomless and control groups (P%0.01). Correlation analysis revealed that SAS and SDS scores were positively correlated with scores of GERD-HRQL in symptom group(P〈0.01) and negatively with all dimensions of SF-36 but physical function (P〈 0.05). Conclusions Most of elderly symptomatic patients with NERDtreated by PPI are in psychological disorders which results in lower quality of life.
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期279-282,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 心理生理学 胃食管反流 质子泵抑制剂 生活质量 Psychophysiology Gastroesophageal reflux Proton pump inhibitors Qualityof life
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Savarino V,Savarino E,Parodi A. Functional heartburn and non-erosive reflux disease[J].Digestive Diseases,2007.172-174.doi:10.1159/000103879.
  • 2郑松柏.老年人胃食管反流病的特点[J].中华老年医学杂志,2009,28(4):265-266. 被引量:18
  • 3Kovács Z,Kerékgyártó O. Psychological factors,quality of life,and gastrointestinal syuptoms inpatients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disorder[J].International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine,2007.139-150.
  • 4姜红梅,徐章,侯晓华.非糜烂性反流病患者心理因素对生活质量影响的研究[J].中华消化杂志,2008,28(3):183-184. 被引量:14
  • 5张峻,郭秀丽,王燕斌,徐有青,杨昭徐.老年胃食管反流病患者临床症状、心理状况和生活质量调查[J].胃肠病学,2010,15(1):25-28. 被引量:25
  • 6van der Velden AW,de Wit NJ. Maintenance treatment for GERD:residual symptoms are associated with psychological distress[J].Digestion,2008.207-213.
  • 7Wu JC,Cheung CM,Wong VW. Distinctclinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis[J].Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology,2007.690-695.
  • 8乾金.心身医学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,20073-4.
  • 9Ponce J,Arguello L,Bastida G. On-demand therapy with rabeprazole in nonerosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in clinical practice:effectiveness,health-related quality of life,and patient satisfaction[J].Digestive Diseases and Sciences,2004.931-936.doi:10.1023/B:DDAS.0000034551.39324.c3.
  • 10Fass R. Proton pump inhibitor failure-what are the therapeutic options[J].American Journal of Gastroenterology,2009,(Suppl 2):S33.doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.50.

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘洋,龚均,董蕾,王学勤,朱有玲.非糜烂性反流病的临床研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2005,36(4):552-554. 被引量:18
  • 2郑松柏,项平,徐富星,欧平安.老年人反流性食管炎1119例分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(8):574-576. 被引量:58
  • 3刘韶辉,熊理守,林金坤,陈旻湖.心理社会因素在非糜烂性反流病发病中作用的研究[J].胃肠病学,2006,11(2):92-95. 被引量:15
  • 4舒良.自评抑郁量表和抑郁状态问卷[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:194-195.
  • 5舒良 见:汪向东 王希林 马弘 编著.自评抑郁量表和抑郁状态问卷[A].见:汪向东,王希林,马弘,编著.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志[C].,1999年增订版.194-196.
  • 6Kulich RK, Malfertheiner P, Madisch A, et al. Psychometric validation of German translation of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale(GSRS) and quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia(QOLRAD) questionnaire in patients with reflux disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2003, 1:62.
  • 7Madisch A, Kulich KR, Malfertheiner P, et al. Impact of reflux disease on general and disease-related quality of lifeevidence from a recent comparative methodological study in Germany. Z Gastroenterol, 2003, 41:1137-1143.
  • 8Miwa H, Minoo T, Hojo M, et al. Oesophageal hypersensitivity in Japanese patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux diseases. Aliment Phaymacol Ther, 2004, (20 suppl 1) : 112- 117.
  • 9Caviglia R, Ribolsi M, Maggiano N, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005, 100 : 543-548.
  • 10Pogromov AP, Diukova GM, Rvkova SM, et al. Psycho-autonomic aspects in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and functional esophageal disorders. Klin Med(Mosk), 2005, 83:41-44.

共引文献53

同被引文献58

  • 1Diana Boj-Carceller,Pilar Bocos-Terraz,Miguel Moreno-Vernis,Alejandro Sanz-Paris,Pablo Trincado-Aznar,Ramón Albero-Gamboa.Are proton pump inhibitors a new antidiabetic drug? A cross sectional study[J].World Journal of Diabetes,2011,2(12):217-220. 被引量:7
  • 2刘洋,龚均,董蕾,王学勤,朱有玲.非糜烂性反流病的临床研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2005,36(4):552-554. 被引量:18
  • 3徐志洁,段丽萍,王琨,夏志伟,林三仁.焦虑和抑郁与胃食管反流病症状发生的相关研究[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(45):3210-3215. 被引量:96
  • 4许军,杨汉,许瑾.消化科住院患者的健康自测[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(18):23-25. 被引量:4
  • 5夏志伟,段卓洋,张莉,徐志洁,段丽萍.精神心理因素与不同亚型胃食管反流病的相关性研究[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(7):447-449. 被引量:35
  • 6Taha AS, Angerson WJ, Morran CG. Correlation between erosive oesophageal and gastro-duodenal diseases the influence of aspirin, simple analgesics, and Helicobacter pylori. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2002, 14: 1313-1317.
  • 7Taha AS, Angerson WJ, Knill-Jones RP, et al. Upper gastrointestinal mucosal abnormalities and blood loss complicating low-dose aspirin and antithrombotie therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2006, 23: 489-495.
  • 8Yeomans N, Lanas A, Labenz J, et al. Efficacy of esomeprazole (20 mg once daily) for reducing the risk o{ gastroduodenal ulcers associated with continuous use of low-dose aspirin. Am J Gastroenterol, 2008, 103 : 2465-2473.
  • 9Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of oesophagits: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology, 1996, 111:85 89.
  • 10Roderick PJ, Wilkers HC, Meade TW. The gastrointestinal toxicity of aspirin: an overview of randomized controlled trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1993,35: 219-226.

引证文献8

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部