期刊文献+

阴式与横切口开腹子宫切除术的卫生经济学评价 被引量:1

Cost-effectiveness analysis of transvaginal hysterectomy vs minilaporotomy hysterectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较阴式子宫切除术(transvaginal hysterectomy,TVH)和横切口开腹子宫切除术(minilaporotomy hysterectomy,MiniLPT)两种手术的费用以及卫生资源利用率。方法:将35例行TVH(阴式组)与43例行MiniLPT(腹式组)的患者治疗前后花费时间、住院费及医疗总费用(包括直接医疗费用、直接非医疗费用和间接费用)进行比较。结果:阴式组直接医疗费、间接医疗费均低于腹式组(P<0.01);阴式组恢复工作时间和误工时间明显短于腹式组(P<0.01)。两种术式住院时间、术前和术后时间及药品费差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:相对于MiniLPT,TVH术后恢复快,并通过减少住院费、手术费及非手术费用,降低间接医疗费用从而提高卫生资源利用率,降低手术成本。 Objective:To compare the cost and effectiveness of transvaginal hysterectomy versus minilaporotomy hysterectomy.Methods:From Oct.2008 to Oct.2009,35 patients were undergone transvaginal hysterectomy(TVH),while 43 cases were submitted to minilaporotomy hysterectomy(MiniLPT).The off-work day,hospital charge,total cost(including direct and indirect cost) were analyzed and compared.Results:The direct cost and indirect cost of TVH were significantly lower than those of MiniLPT(P〈0.01).The return-work and off-work days were significantly shorter in TVH group than in MiniLPT group(P〈0.01).But the hospitalization time and drug cost in the two groups had no statistical difference(P〉0.05).Conclusions:Compared to MiniLPT,TVH can recover quickly and improve cost-effectiveness utilization and decreasing operation cost through decreasing direct and indirect cost.
作者 张慰
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2012年第3期284-285,共2页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 子宫切除术 成本效果分析 hysterectomy cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1申向梅,林学霞.小切口开腹改良全子宫切除术的临床应用[J].河南外科学杂志,2004,10(5):28-29. 被引量:1
  • 2夏恩兰.子宫切除术的术式选择[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2005,32(5):269-270. 被引量:94
  • 3刘彦.妇科微创手术学研究进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(1):15-17. 被引量:31
  • 4Falcone T, Waiters M. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 111: 753-767.
  • 5Reich H, Roberts L. Laparoscopic hysterectomy incurrent gynaecological practice. Reviews in Gynaecological Practice, 2003, 3: 32-40.
  • 6Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy. BMJ, 2004, 328(7432): 134-137.
  • 7Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, 2: 1-125.
  • 8Kluivers K, Ohnson N, Chien P, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life A systematic review. EurJ Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2008, 136: 3-8.
  • 9Panici P, Zullo M, Angioli R, et al. Minilaparotomy hysterectomy a valid option for the treatment of benign uterine pathologies. EurJ Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2005, 119(2): 232-236.
  • 10Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Longo R, et al. Minilaparotomy in the management of benign gynecologic disease. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2005, 119: 232-236.

共引文献114

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部