期刊文献+

Social networks improve leaderless group navigation by facilitating long-distance communication 被引量:1

Social networks improve leaderless group navigation by facilitating long-distance communication
原文传递
导出
摘要 Group navigation is of great importance for many animals, such as migrating flocks of birds or shoals of fish. One theory states that group membership can improve navigational accuracy compared to limited or less accurate individual naviga- tional ability in groups without leaders ("Many-wrongs principle"). Here, we simulate leaderless group navigation that includes social connections as preferential interactions between individuals. Our results suggest that underlying social networks can reduce navigational errors of groups and increase group cohesion. We use network summary statistics, in particular network motifs, to study which characteristics of networks lead to these improvements. It is networks in which preferences between individuals are not clustered, but spread evenly across the group that are advantageous in group navigation by effectively enhancing long-distance information exchange within groups. We suggest that our work predicts a base-line for the type of social structure we might expect to find in group-living animals that navigate without leaders
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第2期329-341,共13页 动物学报(英文版)
关键词 Collective motion Social networks Group navigation Network motifs Many-wrongs principle Individual-based model 社会网络 通信导航 导航精度 社会关系 汇总统计 信息交流 社会结构 领导人
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Barabasi AL, Albert R, 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509-512.
  • 2Benvenuti S, Baldaccini NE, 1985. Pigeon orientation: A com- parison between single birds and small flocks. Ornis Stand. 16: 45-48.
  • 3Bergrnan G, Donner KO, 1964. An analysis of the spring migra- tion of the common scoter and the long-tailed duck in southern Finland. Acta Zool. Fenn. 105: 1-60.
  • 4Biro D, Sumpter DJT, Meade J, Guilford T, 2006. From compro- mise to leadership in pigeon homing. Curr. Biol. 16: 2123-2128.
  • 5Bode NWF, Faria JJ, Franks DW, Krause J, Wood, AJ, 2010. How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups. Proc. R. Soe. B 277: 3065-3070.
  • 6Bode NWF, Franks DW, Wood AJ, 2011a. Limited interactions in flocks: Relating model simulations to empirical data. Proc. R. Soc. Interf. 8: 301-304.
  • 7Bode NWF, Wood AJ, Franks DW, 201lb. Social networks and models for collective motion in animals. Behav. Ecol. Socio- biol. 65: 117-130.
  • 8Bode NWF, Wood AJ, Franks DW, 2011c. The impact of social networks on animal collective motion. Anim. Behav. 82: 29-38.
  • 9Bode NWF, Franks DW, Wood AJ, 2012. Leading from the front? Social networks in navigating groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1331-6.
  • 10Codling EA, Pitchford JW, Simpson SD, 2007. Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal move- ment. Ecology 88:1864-1870.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部