分析法学视角下的法律行为“合法性”

On "Legality" of Juristic Acts from an Analytical Jurisprudence Perspective

法律行为合法性难题经久不衰。依据规范分析法学,词语意义的探究以其正确的使用范围为基础,有效、无效乃是私法评价法律行为的特定词语,当用合法与违法的术语来评价法律行为时,虽不能揭示出法律行为的具体效果,但却为公法规范进入民法自治领域提供了渠道。这两套用语体系存在的基础在于公法、私法的区分。公法与私法的表达方法尽管不同,但其内在价值秩序应当是统一的,其落脚点都是人,法律爱每一个人。

The legality of juristic acts is an ever-lasting controversial topic.According to normative and analytical jurisprudence,the proper meaning of terminology should be confined to its correct application scope,so validity and invalidity are specific terms used by private laws to evaluate juristic acts.However,when legality and illegality are introduced,the specific effects of juristic acts cannot be defined but offering channel for public laws to enter into autonomy of civil laws.The two sets of terms differ in their basis of public laws or private laws.Though with different expressions,their inner value order should be consistent and focus on human beings as essence since law is benevolent to everyone.