摘要
作为上位法,《电信条例》和《管理办法》不能为《规定》关于用户必须使用真实身份注册微博客账户、网站提供微博客服务必须经过审批的条文提供依据,《规定》为行政相对人设定的义务和责任,突破了上位法的明确规定,《规定》对政府规制权力的宣示和预设缺乏合法依据,是一部存在合法性瑕疵的政府规制文件,与行政法治的要求不相符合。
As the higher law,neither the Telecommunication Ordinance nor the Administration Measure can provide legitimating basis for the Provision on the micro-blog real name system and the administrative examination and approval of websites' business to offer micro-blog service.The Provision enacts obligations and duties for administrative relative party with breaking the definite regulations of the higher law and declares government's regulative power without the legitimating basis.So the Provision is a regulative document with the legitimacy flaw and is not in conformity with the rule of law.
出处
《南京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期90-96,共7页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
微博
规制
合法性
《规定》
micro-blog
regulation
legitimacy
the Provision