期刊文献+

手助腹腔镜行结肠癌切除 被引量:12

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨手助腹腔镜(HALS)行结肠癌根治术的临床效果。方法:将2010年1月—2011年5月住院的结肠癌患者,随机分成HALS组(21例),传统腹腔镜(LS)组(25例)和常规开腹组(24例),对其临床资料效果进行对比分析。结果:HALS组21例全部完成HALS,LS组23例完成LS,2例中转开腹,但两组中转率差异无统计学意义。HALS组较LS组平均手术时间短(153.9 min vs.171.7 min)(P=0.011)。HALS组与LS组相比术中失血量、平均住院日、总费用、术后排气时间、淋巴结清扫数目均无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。与开腹组比较,HALS组手术时间有所增加(153.9 min vs.131.8 min)(P=0.002),但术中失血量,术后排气时间,住院时间均明显缩短(均P<0.05),两组清除淋巴结数量无统计学差异。结论:HALS结肠癌根治术同样具备传统腹腔镜手术微创,安全,术后恢复快的优点,同时缩短了手术时间。 Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in the radical operation of colon cancer. Methods: Patients with colon cancer admitted to our hospital from January of 2010 to May of 2011 were selected and randomly divided into the HALS group (21 cases), conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) group (2S cases) and open surgery group (24 cases). The clinical results of the three groups were compared and analyzed. Results: HALS was successfully performed on all of the 21 cases of HALS group, and in LS group, LS was performed on 23 cases and 2 cases were converted to open surgery, but the conversion rates between the two groups had no statistical difference. The average operative time of the HALS group was shorter than that of the LS group (1S3.9 min vs. 171.7 min) (P=0.011). There were no statistical differences in intraoperative blood loss, average length of hospitalization, total cost, time to first passage of gas, and number of dissected lymph nodes between the HALS and LS group (all P〉0.05). Compared with the open surgery group, the operative time of the HALS group was somewhat prolonged (153.9 min vs. 131.8 min) (P=0.002), but the intraoperative blood loss, time to first passage of gas, and the average length of hospital stay were markedly reduced (all P〈0.05), and the numbers of dissected lymph nodes between the 2 groups had no obvious difference. Conclusion: HALS for radical resection of colon cancer not only has the same advantage of minimal invasion, safe and quick recovery as the conventional LS, but also shortens the operative time.
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期407-410,共4页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 结肠肿瘤/外科学 腹腔镜 手辅助 结肠切除术/方法 Colonic Neoplasms/surg Laparoscopes, Hand-Assisted Colectomy/methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Braga M,Pecorelli N,Frasson M. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy[J].World J Gastrointest Oncol,2011,(03):43-48.doi:10.4251/wjgo.v3.i3.43.
  • 2Li S,Chi P,Lin H. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open resection for middle and lower rectal cancer:an NTCLES study[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2011,(10):3175-3182.doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1683-4.
  • 3Aalbers AG,Doeksen A,Van Berge Henegouwen MI. Handassisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery:a systematic review[J].Colorectal Disease,2010,(04):287-295.doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01827.x.
  • 4邱辉忠,林国乐,吴斌,肖毅,周皎琳.手助腹腔镜下结肠癌切除:附50例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(6):556-558. 被引量:12
  • 5Larson DW,Boostrom SY,Cima RR. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer:short-term benefits and oncologic outcomes using more than one technique[J].Techniques in Coloproctology,2010,(02):125-131.doi:10.1007/s10151-010-0577-0.
  • 6黄元媛,黄宗海,俞金龙,厉周.“蓝碟”手助腹腔镜结肠癌根治术20例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(12):952-953. 被引量:6
  • 7Schwenk W,Haase O,Neudecker J. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection[J].Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2005,(03):CD003145.
  • 8Sammour T,Kahokehr A,Srinivasa S. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery[J].Annals of Surgery,2011,(01):35-43.doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318204a8b4.
  • 9Aalbers AG,Biere SS,van Berge Henegouwen M1. Handassisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2008,(08):1769-1780.doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9857-4.
  • 10Meshikhes AW. Controversy of hand-assisted laparoscopie colorectal surgery[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,(45):5662-5668.doi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5662.

二级参考文献16

  • 1陆显斌,刘克龙.恶性肿瘤腹腔镜手术的根治性问题[J].中国普通外科杂志,2004,13(12):933-935. 被引量:1
  • 2邱磊,廖健南,谢沛标.腹腔镜结直肠手术21例分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2004,13(12):947-948. 被引量:6
  • 3冀涛,刘隆,王秋生.手助腹腔镜手术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(1):80-82. 被引量:19
  • 4王国斌,牛彦锋,卢晓明,陶凯雄,蔡开琳,龙跃平,舒晓刚,帅晓明.腹腔镜辅助下结直肠癌手术的疗效分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(8):561-564. 被引量:13
  • 5Tomita H, Marcello PW, Milsom JW. Laparoscopic surger), of the colon and rectum [ J ] . World J Surg, 1999, 23 (4) :297 - 305.
  • 6Darzi A. Hand-assisted laparoseopie colorectal surgery. [J]. Serain Laparose Surg, 2001 , 8(2) : 153-160.
  • 7Targarona EM, Gracia E, Rodriguez M, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. [J]. Arch Surg, 2003, 138(2):133-141.
  • 8Sjoerdsma W,Meijer DW,Jansen A,et al.Comparison of effiencies of three techniques for colon surgery[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2000,10 (1):47-53.
  • 9Ballantyne GH,Leahy PF.Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy evolution to a clinically useful technique[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(5):753-765.
  • 10Kang JC,Chung MH,Chao PC,et al.Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy a prospective randomized study[J].Surg Endosc,2004,18(4):577-581.

共引文献16

同被引文献102

引证文献12

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部