期刊文献+

孟子与“疑经”时代 被引量:1

Mencius and the Age of Suspecting Canons
原文传递
导出
摘要 孟子是儒家思想的主要代表。人们通常以为,孟子与其他儒家学者一样,相信《诗经》、《尚书》等经典,并通过传播经典,弘扬儒家思想。然而,从文献和思想史的双重角度来看,与其说孟子"传经",不如说孟子"疑经"。面对《诗经》,孟子提出"不以文害辞,不以辞害志";针对《尚书》,孟子主张"尽信《书》,则不如无《书》"。对待《礼》,他认为也不必恪守于字字句句。这反映了孟子对待经典的反思、质疑与怀疑的态度和意识。这种态度与意识是孟子哲学尤其是其语言哲学的必然结果。同时,《庄子》、荀子等对经典的批判也表明:此一时期的经学已经进入到一个需要反思、怀疑和批判的时代——"疑经"时代。孟子所倡导的"疑经"时代,为后来经学的发展提供了更广阔的空间。 It is widely granted that Mencius, as an important representative of Confucian school, must support the Confucian canons and broadcasting them. In the aspects of both the texts and the logic of intellectual history, this article argues that it is more accurate to suggest that Mencius doubt the canons other than Mencius broadcast the canons. As to the Poem, Mencius argues that the words of the Poems should not bring any harm to the agents' will. As to the Book, Mencius argues that it is better to abandon the Book if the Book be trusted completely. As to the Politeness Book, Mencius suggests that it be better to act according to one's conscience independently instead of following the precepts of the Politeness Book. Mencius's and his contemporaries' doubting some principles of the canons demonstrates that this era is an age of doubting the canons.
作者 沈顺福
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期40-47,共8页 Academic Monthly
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2011年度重点项目"儒家形而上学:儒家哲学的基本问题及其历史演变"(11JJD720014) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-11-0308)的阶段性成果
关键词 孟子 经学 “疑经”时代 Mencius, Confucian classics, age of suspecting canons
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1Hegel, Vorlesungen tiber die Geschichte der Philosophie I , Werke 18, Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1971, P49.
  • 2Kant, Critik der reinen Vernunfi, Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 199d, P312.
  • 3Wilhelm Von Humboldt, Schriften Zur Sprachphilosophie, Werke, III, Wissenschaftliche, Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1994, P426.
  • 4Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London, William Tegg & Co. , Cheapside. Mdcccxlix, 1841, P288.
  • 5《声无哀乐论》,夏明钊,《嵇康集译注》,黑龙江人民出版社,1987年.
  • 6Austin, How to do Things With Words?,外语教学与研究出版社,2002年,P92.
  • 7Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode, J. C. B. Mohr ( Paul Siebeck) Ttibingen, P70.
  • 8Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of scientific Revolution(second edition ), The University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970, P66,175.
  • 9Wittgenstein, Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.中国社会科学出版社,1999.第4.01条.
  • 10Russell: Foundations of Logic ( 1903 - 1905 ), London : Routledge inc. 1994. P416.

共引文献6

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部