期刊文献+

血液病危重症患者的ICU转归及费用研究 被引量:1

Cost Analysis and Prognosis of the Critically Ill Patients with Hematological Diseases in ICU
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析化疗及造血干细胞移植后的血液病患者ICU转归及费用,探讨降低费用的方法。方法将ICU患者分为血液病组和非血液病组,比较两组的日均费用、急性生理和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、抗生素费用占总费用比例、呼吸机使用率及病死率。结果血液病组和非血液病组患者日均费用分别为(9258.81±3642.14)元和(6432.11±8030.85)元、抗生素费用占总费用比例分别为(25±13)%和(17±11)%、APACHEⅡ评分分别为(21.4±8.1)分和(15.8±8.5)分、病死率分别为58.2%和38.2%,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);两组患者呼吸机使用率分别为69.5%和52.3%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论化疗及造血干细胞移植后感染的血液病患者较非血液病患者病情重、费用高、病死率高,应在达到入住ICU标准后,在APACHEⅡ评分较低时尽早进入ICU治疗,控制病情进展,安全度过危重期,降低病死率及费用。 Objective To analyze the cost and prognosis of the critically ill patients with hematological diseases after chemotherapy and hematopoietie stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in ICU. Methods All the patients in ICU were divided into hematological disease group and non - hematological disease group. The total cost, average daily cost, Acute Physiology andChronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ ) score, ventilator utilization rate, antibiotic use, and mortality were compared be- tween the two groups. Results The average daily cost, percentage of antibiotics among all the costs, APACHE Ⅱ score, and mortality in the hematological disease group were (9 258. 81 ± 3 642. 14) yuan, (25 ± 13 )%, (21.4 ± 8. 1 ), and 58.2%,respectively, which were significantly different from those in the non - hematological disease group [ ( 6 432. 11 ±8 030. 85 ) yuan, (17 ±11)%, (15.8 ±8.5) and 38.2% 3 (allP 〈0. 05). The ventilator utilization rate was 69. 5% in hematologicaldisease group and 52. 3% in non - hematological disease group (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion The critically ill patients with hema- tological diseases were inferior to the non - hematological diseases patients in terms of mortality and cost. The critically ill patients with hematological diseases should be transferred to ICU when their APACHE Ⅱscores remain low.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期882-884,共3页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 血液病危重症 重症监护病房 预后 卫生保健费用 Critical hematological diseases ICU~ Prognosis Health care costs
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

共引文献106

同被引文献9

  • 1Wang G S,Yang L,Ma H F,et al.Different medical expenses incurred by appendiceal cystadenoma in China:Report of three cases[J].Oncol Lett,2013,5(4):1343-1346.
  • 2Bauer M,Ostermann H.DRGs in transfusion medicine and hemotherapy in germany[J].Transfus Med Hemother,2012,39(2):60-66.
  • 3康晓洁.城镇职工终末期肾病血液透析与腹膜透析比较研究[D].沈阳:中国医科大学,2011.
  • 4Wild V,Pfister E,Biller-Andorno N.Ethical research on the implementation of DRGs in Switzerland--a challenging project[J].Swiss Med Wkly,2012,142:w13610.
  • 5Lotter O,Amr A,Chiarello P,et al.Diagnosis-Related Groups in Hand Surgery--a comparison of six European countries[J].Ger Med Sci,2012,10:c8.
  • 6朱士俊,鲍玉荣,刘爱民,刘海一,罗艳侠,闫宇翔,常文虎,张迎媛,鲁盛康,刘俊田,张正华.北京地区医院按DRGs付费和临床路径应用研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2008,24(3):145-147. 被引量:38
  • 7刘亦农.血液透析和腹膜透析的成本效用分析[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2011,27(1):6-6. 被引量:9
  • 8阿布都沙拉木·依米提,朱琳,陈浦兰,再依奴尔·阿不都外力,赵婷,阿里木江·艾山.基于临床路径制定住院费用标准的研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2012,28(4):274-276. 被引量:9
  • 9罗娟,汪泓,吴忠.基于DRGs模式的上海医疗保险支付方式研究[J].现代经济信息,2012,0(23):259-260. 被引量:5

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部