摘要
本研究采用顶空-固相微萃取法(HS-SPME)和气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)比较分析了中国和马来西亚醇提蜂胶(EEP)的挥发性成分。结果显示,中国醇提蜂胶的挥发性成分中检测到60种物质,其中姜黄烯、雪松烯、苯乙醇、乙酸苯乙酯和柏木烯含量较高;马来西亚醇提蜂胶挥发性成分中检测到29种物质,其中苯甲醛、萘、2-戊基呋喃、2-甲基萘和可巴烯含量较高;中国醇提蜂胶的挥发性成分含量较之马来西亚醇提蜂胶高出约10倍;二者挥发性成分之间的共有物质为乙醇、苯乙烯、柏木烯、苯甲醇和4-乙基-2-甲氧基苯酚,但含量明显不同。
The volatile components in ethanolic extract of propolis （EEP） from China and Malaysia were compared by head space solid-phase microextraction （HS-SPME） and gas chromatography-mass spectrum （GC-MS）. As the results, 60 components were found in EEP from China. Curcumene, himachalene, phenylethyl alcohol, phenethyl acetate and cedrene were the major components of EEP from China. 29 components were found in EEP from Malaysia. Benzaldehyde, naphthalene, 2-pentyl furan, 2-methyl naphthalene and copaene were the major components in EEP from Malaysia. The content of volatile components in EEP from China were 10 times than that in EEP from Malaysia. In 2 types of EEP, common components, including ethanol, styrene, cedrene, benzyl alcohol and 4-ethyl-2-methoxy phenol, were found with different concentration.
出处
《现代食品科技》
EI
CAS
北大核心
2012年第4期456-461,475,共7页
Modern Food Science and Technology
基金
国家现代蜜蜂产业技术体系项目(NYCYTI-43-KXJ17)
科研院所技术开发专项(2009EG134274)
农业科技成果转化资金项目(2010GB23260588)
关键词
醇提蜂胶
挥发性成分
差异比较
ethanolic extract ofpropolis （EEP）
volatile components
difference comparison
