期刊文献+

经皮顺行腔内切开术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 被引量:1

Treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with percutaneous endopyelotomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨应用经皮顺行腔内切开术(PAE)治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)的适应症、疗效及技巧。方法:UPJO患者75例,其中肾盂输尿管连接部(UPJ)闭锁26例(34.7%)。男38例,女37例,平均年龄35(21~68)岁。左侧31例,右侧44例。原发性UPJO 39例(合并结石37例),开放UPJO成形术后8例,腹腔镜UPJO成形术后4例,开放手术取石术后14例,PCNL术后10例。均经B超、KUB、IVU、CT、逆行肾盂造影检查确诊。结果:Ⅰ期成功内切开69例(92.0%),4例(5.3%)间隔1周后Ⅱ期手术成功,2例放弃Ⅱ期治疗。单一应用PAE 59例(80.8%),PAE联合输尿管镜逆行内切开14例(19.2%)。术后3~6个月拔除输尿管支架管,随访6个月时,62例(84.9%)无复发,复发患者11例(15.1%)中包括UPJ闭锁患者10例。随访12个月时,55例(75.3%)无复发,24个月时52例(71.2%)无复发。21例复发患者中,9例行第二次PAE手术治愈,2例行第三次PAE手术后治愈,1例行开放肾盂成形术,9例每3~6个月更换双J管或动态观察。结论:PAE可以作为原发性UPJO的一线治疗。继发性UPJO或其他成形术后再狭窄的UPJO复发率高,但是PAE适用范围广,可重复性好,仍然是微创腔内治疗的有效手段。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endopyelotomy (PAE) in the minimally t invasive treatmentof ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Method; Between June 200g and August 2010, 75 patients of UPJO had undergone PAE. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Success was defined as both ra- diographic and symptomatic improvement, ltesult: Sixty-nine(92. 0%) patients were operated in one session of PAE, and 4 needed second session of PAE, 2 abandoned further treatment. Single PAE operations were per formed in 59(80.8%) patients. Combined antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy were performed in 14(19.2~) patients. 65 patients were treated by electrocautery endopyelotomy, 5 by holmium laser, 3 by cold knife. The esti-- mated 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months recurrence-free survival rates for the endopyelotomy group were 84.9%, 75.3%, and 71.2%, respectively. Conclusion:PAE is effective for treatment of UPJO, while the recur- rence rate for secondary UPJO and those failed other treatment modality is high.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2012年第4期267-269,273,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 内窥镜术 手术 percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgical management
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1刘永达,袁坚.金属网状支架在继发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(8):554-556. 被引量:7
  • 2M.C. Ost,J.D. Kaye,M.J. Guttman.Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction[].Urology.2005
  • 3Dimarco DS,Gettman MT,McGee SM.Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution[].Journal of Endourology.2006
  • 4Rukin N J,,Ashdown D A,Patel P,et al.The role of percutane-ous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction[].Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.2007
  • 5IS Zeltscher,JB Liu,DH Bagley.The incidence of crossing vessels in patients with normal ureteropelvic junction examined with endoluminal ultrasound[].Journal d Urologie.2004

二级参考文献5

  • 1Ng CS,Yost AJ,Streem SB.Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.12-year,single-center experience.Urology,2003,61:291-296.
  • 2Gallo FJ,Beneitez ME.Current role of percutaneous renal surgery at a service of general urology.Arch Esp Urol,2001,54:1111-1116.
  • 3Pauer W.Use of self-expanding permanent endoluminal stents for benign ureteral strictures.Six years experience and review of the literature.Urologe A,2002,41:267-272.
  • 4Barbalias GA,Liatsikos EN,Kagadis GC,et al.Ureteropelvic junction obstruction:an innovative approach combining metallic stenting and virtual endoscopy.J Urol,2002,168:2383-2386.
  • 5李逊,吴开俊.金属网状支架在治疗上尿路闭锁中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2000,21(5):299-300. 被引量:5

共引文献6

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部