不同方法治疗儿童幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效对比

目的比较序贯疗法与标准三联疗法治疗儿童幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效。方法选取收治的感染幽门螺杆菌的儿童90例,将90例患儿随机分为试验组和对照组各45例,试验组采用序贯疗法治疗,对照组采用标准三联疗法。疗程结束后对试验组和对照组的幽门螺杆菌根除率进行比较。结果试验组的幽门螺杆菌根除率为93.3%,对照组的幽门螺杆菌根除率为77.8%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论序贯疗法相对于标准三联疗法的疗效更佳,具有价格合理,药物副作用轻等优点,值得临床推广。

Objective To compare the effect of sequential therapy and standard triple therapy for helicobacter pylori in children. Methods 90 patients with helicobacter pylori were divided into the observation group and the control group randomly. The eradication rates in two groups were compared. Results The eradication rate of sequential therapy was higher than that of standard triple therapy. The difference was statistically significant （P0.05） Conclusion Sequential therapy is more effective, safer and price is reasonable. It was suggested to be popularized.