摘要
目的:探讨不同全麻维持方式对胃肠外科手术患者苏醒期躁动的影响。方法:择期胃肠外科手术患者160例,相同麻醉方案诱导后,分为4组(每组40例),A组全凭静脉麻醉;B1和B2组静吸复合麻醉,B1组手术结束前停止吸入麻药时间≤25min,B2组手术结束前停止吸入麻药时间>25min;C组全凭吸入麻醉(术毕间断吸除机械无效腔气体)。记录手术时间、麻醉维持时间和苏醒期躁动发生率。结果:4组手术时间和麻醉维持时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.498和0.870,P>0.05)。4组躁动发生率相比,差异有统计学意义(χ2=18.824,P<0.001),其中B1组躁动发生率高于其他3组(P<0.008)。结论:全凭静脉麻醉,全凭吸入麻醉及静吸复合麻醉、停止吸入麻药到手术结束时间>25min者躁动发生率低,麻醉医师可根据患者情况选择适合的麻醉维持方式。
Aim:To observe the influence of different patterns of general anesthesia(GA) maintainance on incidence of emergence agitation(EA) in patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery.Methods:A total of 160 patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery were allocated into four groups,40 in each group,and induced with the same anesthesia prescription.Group A maintained GA with total intravenous anesthesia;group B1 and B2,with combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia:for group B1,the inhalation stop to operation end was controlled within 25 min,and for group B2,which was controlled over 25 min;group C maintained GA with total inhalation(the mechanical invalid cavity gas was exhausted after operation discontinously).The surgical duration,anesthesia time and EA incidence were recorded.Results:The operation duration and anesthesia time among the four groups had no statistical significance(F=0.498,0.870,P0.05),while the EA incidence existed significant difference(χ2=18.824,P0.001),among which,the EA incidence in group B1 was higher than those in the other 3 groups(P0.008).Conclusion:The incidences of EA for total intravenous anesthesia,total inhalation,and combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia with early stop of inhalation are low,and can be chosen accordingly.
出处
《郑州大学学报(医学版)》
CAS
北大核心
2012年第2期262-264,共3页
Journal of Zhengzhou University(Medical Sciences)
关键词
异丙酚
七氟醚
全身麻醉
苏醒期躁动
propofol
sevoflurane
general anesthesia
emergence agitation