期刊文献+

不同全麻维持方式对胃肠外科手术患者苏醒期躁动的影响 被引量:10

Influence of different patterns of general anesthesia maintainance on incidence of emergence agitation in patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同全麻维持方式对胃肠外科手术患者苏醒期躁动的影响。方法:择期胃肠外科手术患者160例,相同麻醉方案诱导后,分为4组(每组40例),A组全凭静脉麻醉;B1和B2组静吸复合麻醉,B1组手术结束前停止吸入麻药时间≤25min,B2组手术结束前停止吸入麻药时间>25min;C组全凭吸入麻醉(术毕间断吸除机械无效腔气体)。记录手术时间、麻醉维持时间和苏醒期躁动发生率。结果:4组手术时间和麻醉维持时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.498和0.870,P>0.05)。4组躁动发生率相比,差异有统计学意义(χ2=18.824,P<0.001),其中B1组躁动发生率高于其他3组(P<0.008)。结论:全凭静脉麻醉,全凭吸入麻醉及静吸复合麻醉、停止吸入麻药到手术结束时间>25min者躁动发生率低,麻醉医师可根据患者情况选择适合的麻醉维持方式。 Aim:To observe the influence of different patterns of general anesthesia(GA) maintainance on incidence of emergence agitation(EA) in patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery.Methods:A total of 160 patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery were allocated into four groups,40 in each group,and induced with the same anesthesia prescription.Group A maintained GA with total intravenous anesthesia;group B1 and B2,with combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia:for group B1,the inhalation stop to operation end was controlled within 25 min,and for group B2,which was controlled over 25 min;group C maintained GA with total inhalation(the mechanical invalid cavity gas was exhausted after operation discontinously).The surgical duration,anesthesia time and EA incidence were recorded.Results:The operation duration and anesthesia time among the four groups had no statistical significance(F=0.498,0.870,P0.05),while the EA incidence existed significant difference(χ2=18.824,P0.001),among which,the EA incidence in group B1 was higher than those in the other 3 groups(P0.008).Conclusion:The incidences of EA for total intravenous anesthesia,total inhalation,and combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia with early stop of inhalation are low,and can be chosen accordingly.
出处 《郑州大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第2期262-264,共3页 Journal of Zhengzhou University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 异丙酚 七氟醚 全身麻醉 苏醒期躁动 propofol sevoflurane general anesthesia emergence agitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1鲍杨,史东平,封卫征.全麻苏醒期患者躁动的研究进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(2):183-184. 被引量:190
  • 2Riker RR,Picard JT,Fraser GL.Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients[J].Crit Care Med,1999,27(7):1325.
  • 3金允淑,马虹.全凭静脉与吸入全身麻醉苏醒期躁动发生率的临床观察[J].辽宁医学杂志,2007,21(2):62-64. 被引量:20
  • 4Cole JW,Murray DJ,Mcallister JD,et al.Emergence be-havior in children:defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2002,12(5):442.
  • 5Zhang Y,Eger EI2nd,Dutton RC,et al.Inhaled anesthetics have hyperalgesic effects at0.1minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration[J].Anesth Analg,2000,91(2):462.
  • 6Galinkin JL,Fazi LM,Cuy RM,et al.Use of intranasal fentanyl in children undergoing myringotomy and tube placement during halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia[J].Anesthesiology,2000,93(6):1378.
  • 7赵连英,类维富,吴小鹏.不同氧流量对上腹部手术全身麻醉患者苏醒期的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2009,12(1):42-44. 被引量:3
  • 8Cohen IT,Finkel JC,Hannallah RS,et al.Rapid emer-gence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane an-aesthesia in infants and children:a comparison with propo-fol[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2003,13(1):63.

二级参考文献33

共引文献205

同被引文献101

  • 1王焕亮,张丽,类维富.异丙酚三明治麻醉技术用于中耳手术的临床评价[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2004,42(6):733-735. 被引量:3
  • 2金允淑,马虹.全凭静脉与吸入全身麻醉苏醒期躁动发生率的临床观察[J].辽宁医学杂志,2007,21(2):62-64. 被引量:20
  • 3庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:600.
  • 4王英伟 孙保木.七氟醚麻醉的苏醒期躁动及其预防.中华实用医药杂志,2003,3(16):190-190.
  • 5Holzman RS, van der Velde ME, Kaus S J, et al. Sevoflurane de- presses myocardial contractility less than halothane during induc- tion of anesthesia in children [J]. Anesthesiology, 1996,85 (6) : 1260-1267.
  • 6Walker SM, Haugen RD, Richards A. A comparison of sevoflurane with halothane for paediatric day case surgery[J]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 1997,25 (6) : 643-649.
  • 7Veyckemans F. Excitation phenomena during sevoflurane anaes- thesia in children [J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2001,4 (3) : 339- 343.
  • 8Davis PJ, Greenberg JA, Gendelman M, et al. Recovery charac- teristics of sevoflurane and halothane in preschool-aged children undergoing bilateral myringotomy and pressure equalization tube insertion[J]. Anesth Analg, 1999,88 ( 1 ) : 34-38.
  • 9Sarner JB, Levine M, Davis PJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of sevofiurane in children. A comparison with halothane [J]. Anes- thesiology, 1995,82 ( 1 ) : 38-46.
  • 10Dexter F, Tinker JH. Comparisons between desflurane and iso- flurane or propofpl on time to following commands and time to discharge. A metaanalysis[J]. Anesthesiology, 1995,83 ( 1 ) : 77-82.

引证文献10

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部