期刊文献+

Bargaining Game Theoretic Power Control in Selfish Cooperative Relay Networks 被引量:1

Bargaining Game Theoretic Power Control in Selfish Cooperative Relay Networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Wireless cooperative communications require appropriate power allocation (PA) between the source and relay nodes. In selfish cooperative communication networks, two partner user nodes could help relaying information for each other, but each user node has the incentive to consume his power solely to decrease its own symbol error rate (SER) at the receiver. In this paper, we propose a fair and efficient PA scheme for the decode-and-forward cooperation protocol in selfish cooperative relay networks. We formulate this PA problem as a two-user cooperative bargaining game, and use Nash bargaining solution (NBS) to achieve a win-win strategy for both partner users. Simulation results indicate that the NBS is fair in that the degree of cooperation of a user only depends on how much contribution its partner can make to decrease its SER at the receiver, and efficient in the sense that the SER performance of both users could be improved through the game. Wireless cooperative communications require appropriate power allocation (PA) between the source and relay nodes. In selfish cooperative communication networks, two partner user nodes could help relaying information for each other, but each user node has the incentive to consume his power solely to decrease its own symbol error rate (SER) at the receiver. In this paper, we propose a fair and efficient PA scheme for the decode-and-forward cooperation protocol in selfish cooperative relay networks. We formulate this PA problem as a two-user cooperative bargaining game, and use Nash bargaining solution (NBS) to achieve a win-win strategy for both partner users. Simulation results indicate that the NBS is fair in that the degree of cooperation of a user only depends on how much contribution its partner can make to decrease its SER at the receiver, and efficient in the sense that the SER performance of both users could be improved through the game.
出处 《International Journal of Automation and computing》 EI 2012年第2期221-224,共4页 国际自动化与计算杂志(英文版)
基金 supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60972059) Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Nos. 2010QNA27 and 2011QNB26) China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 20100481185) the Ph. D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Nos. 20090095120013 and 20110095120006) Talent Introduction Program, and Young Teacher Sailing Program of China University of Mining and Technology
关键词 Cooperative relaying DECODE-AND-FORWARD power allocation cooperative game theory Nash bargaining solution. Cooperative relaying, decode-and-forward, power allocation, cooperative game theory, Nash bargaining solution.
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1J.N.Laneman,D.N.C.Tse,G.M.Wornell. Cooperative diversity in wireless networks:Efficient protocols and outage behavior[J].IEEE Transactions on Information theory,2004,(12):3062-3080.
  • 2W.F.Su,A.K.Sadek,K.J.R.Liu. SER performance analysis and optimum power allocation for decode-and-forward cooperation protocol in wireless networks[A].IEEE,New Orleans,USA,2005.984-989.
  • 3Z.G.Cao,X.G.Yang. Coalition formation in weighted simple-majority games under proportional payoff allocation rules[J].International Journal of Automation and Computing,2009,(03):217-222.doi:10.1007/s11633-009-0217-1.
  • 4S.M.Lucas. Computational intelligence and games:Chal lenges and opportunities[J].International Journal of Automation and Computing,2008,(01):45-57.
  • 5G.P.Zhang,L.Cong,E.Ding,K.Yang,X.D.Yang. Fair and efficient resource sharing for selfish cooperative communication networks using cooperative game theory[A].IEEE,Tokyo,Japan,2011.1-5.
  • 6S.Q.Xu,Q.Y.Zhang,W.Lin. PSO-based OFDM adaptive power and bit allocation for multiuser cognitive radio system[A].IEEE,Beijing,PRC,2009.1-4.

同被引文献9

  • 1John Nash, The Bargaining Problem [ J]. Econometrica, 1950 (1) :155 -162.
  • 2Binmore, Ken. Fun and games: A Text on Game Theory[M]. D. C:Heath and Company. 1992.
  • 3Ariel Rubinstein, Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model [ J]. Econometrica, 1982 ( 1 ) : 97 - 109.
  • 4Douglas Gale, Strategic Foundations of General Equilibrium: Dynamic Matching and Bargaining Games[ M ]. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 5Abhinay Muthoo, Bargaining Theory with Applications [ M ]. Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 6D. Abreu, F. Gul. Bargaining and Reputation [ J ]. Econometrica, 2000 , (68) :85 - 117.
  • 7D. Abreu , D. Pearce. Bargaining , Reputation and Equilibrium Selection in Repeated Games[ Z] , Working Paper ,2002.
  • 8Van Damme. Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria [ M ]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
  • 9Tanjim Hossain, Bargaining with Learning[ J]. JEL Classifications. 2006.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部