期刊文献+

严重脓毒症目标血糖管理下P-选择素变化的临床意义 被引量:4

The study of changes and clinical significance of p - selectin in target glucose control therapy for serious septic patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨严重脓毒症目标血糖管理过程中P一选择素(CD62p)浓度的动态变化及其临床意义。方法将45例严重脓毒症患者随机分为:A组23例(目标血糖控制在4.1.6.1mmol/L);B组22例(目标血糖控制在6.2~8.3mmol/L)。在入院时就给予目标血糖控制,分别在第0、8、12、24及72小时采集静脉血,用ELISA法检测CD62p浓度,用生化仪测定血小板计数(PLT)、血浆凝血酶原时间(盯)、活化的部分凝血活酶时间(APIrr)及纤维蛋白原(FIB)的变化;相同时间点观察急性生理学和慢性健康状况Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分,并计算28d病死率。另外,根据28d生存情况将患者分为死亡组和存活组进行对比分析。结果A、B两组随着治疗时间的延长,CD62p浓度及APACHEH评分均下降,治疗第24、72小时与入院时比较差异有统计学意义(P均〈0.05);治疗第72小时A组CD62p浓度及APACHEⅡ评分均低于B组(P均〈0.05)。28d病死率:A组21.74%(5/23)与B组27.27%(6/22)比较降低,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组治疗前后PT、APTr、FIB和PLT差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。死亡组CD62p浓度及APACHEH评分均明显高于存活组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。脓毒症患者入院时CD62p浓度与APACHEH评分呈正相关(r=0.734,P〈0.01)。结论严重脓毒症患者在目标血糖管理下,能显著抑制CD62p浓度、降低病死率和改善预后,CD62p有望成为判断脓毒症病情严重程度和预后的良好指标。 Objective To Explore the dynamic changes and clinical significance of the p - selectin (CD62p) in target glucose control therapy for serious septic patients. Methods 45 serious septic patients were randomly divided into two groups: target glucose control A group 23 cases (glucose control in 4.1 - 6.1 mmol/L) and target glucose control B group 22 cases ( blood glucose control in 6.2 - 8.3 mmol/L), in admitted cases were given target glucose control, Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) was used in the detection of CD62p in 0 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h in all patients with serious septic patients, with biochemical instrument determination levels of platelet ( PLT), and prothrombin time ( PT), activated partial thromboplastin time ( APTF ) and fibrinogen ( FIB ), and observing Score of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II ( APACHE 1I ) and record 28 d mortality. Also survival under 28 d divides patients into death unit ( 11 cases) and survival set ( 33 cases) comparative analysis. Results Both APACHE 1I and CD62p levels in A and B group decreased with passage of time, the differences were significant between the results in 24 h, 72 h comparison of treatment on admission ( both P 〈0.05 ). In the A group, APACHE 11 and CD62p levels decreased, and they were lower than those in B group 72 h after treatment ( both P 〈 0.05 ). The mortality rate in 28days also lowered[21.74% vs. 27.27% ] in A group, but the difference was not significant (P 〉 0.05). Death group CD62p and APACHE II scores significantly are higher than survival group, the difference with statistically significant'-' (P 〈 0. 05 ). Admission in patients with sepsis CD62p, APACHE 11 scores is positive ( r = 0.734, P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion target glucose control management can significantly suppress the expression of CD62p, lower fatality rate, P - selectin is expected to become a good indicator to determine the sepsis severity and prognosis.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期310-314,共5页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 目标血糖 严重脓毒症 P一选择素(CD62p) 预后 Target glucose control Sepsis P - selectin(CD62p) Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献57

  • 1Taylor JH,Beilman GJ.Hyperglycemia in the intensive care unit:no longer just a marker of illness severity.Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2005;6:233-245.
  • 2Sung J,Bochicchio GV,Joshi M,Bochicchio K,Tracy K,Scalea TM.Admission hyperglycemia is predictive of outcome in critically ill trauma patients.J Trauma 2005;59:80-83.
  • 3van den Berghe G,Wouters P,Weekers F,Verwaest C,Bruyninckx F,Schetz M,Vlasselaers D,Ferdinande P,Lauwers P,Bouillon R.Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients.N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-1367.
  • 4Van den Berghe G,Wilmer A,Hermans G,Meersseman W,Wouters PJ,Milants I,Van Wijngaerden E,Bobbaers H,Bouillon R.Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU.NEngl J Med 2006;354:449-461.
  • 5Finfer S,Chittock DR,Su SY,Blair D,Foster D,Dhingra V,Bellomo R,Cook D,Dodek P,Henderson WR,Hébert PC,Heritier S,Heyland DK,McArthur C,McDonald E,Mitchell I,Myburgh JA,Norton R,Potter J,Robinson BG,Ronco JJ.Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.N Engl J Med 2009;360:1283-1297.
  • 6Remick DG.Pathophysiology of sepsis.Am J Pathol 2007;170:1435-1444.
  • 7Rittirsch D,Flierl MA,Ward PA.Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis.Nat Rev Immunol 2008;8:776-787.
  • 8Cinel I,Opal SM.Molecular biology of inflammation and sepsis:a primer.Crit Care Med 2009;37:291-304.
  • 9Norbury WB,Jeschke MG,Herndon DN.Metabolism modulators in sepsis:propranolol.Crit Care Med 2007;35:S616-S620.
  • 10Marik PE,Raghavan M.Stress-hyperglycemia,insulin and immunomodulation in sepsis.Intensive Care Med 2004;30:748-756.

共引文献65

同被引文献58

  • 1王海英,王北宁(审校),樊卫红.P-选择素的检测及其临床意义[J].中华临床医学卫生杂志,2006,4(1):43-44. 被引量:6
  • 2王延吉.有机化工原料[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004..
  • 3姜宇.化学修饰甲壳素/壳聚糖对P-选择素介导的细胞粘附抑制作用的研究[M].长春:东北师范大学,2009:I.
  • 4Dellinger R P, Levy M M, Rhodes A, et al.Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012[J]. Intens Care Med, 2013, 39(2): 165-228.
  • 5Dellinger R P, Levy M M, Cadet J M, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008[J]. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1):296-327.
  • 6Dellinger R P, Carlet J M, Masur H, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Intens Care Med, 2004, 30(4):536-555.
  • 7冯慧远,胡敦重,崔云亮,等.不同血糖变异指标在脓毒症患者预后评估中的对比研究[J].中国急救医学,2015,34(1):9-11.
  • 8Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive in sulin therapy in critically ill patients[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345 (19):1 359-1 367.
  • 9Brunkhorst F M, Engel C, Bloos F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(2):125-139.
  • 10Finfer S, Chittoek D R, Su S Y, et al. Intensive versus con- ventional glucose control in critically ill patients[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(13):1 283-1 297.

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部