期刊文献+

基于FTA仿真的三高气田事故风险概率 被引量:3

Accident risk probability for “Three Highs” gas fields based on fault tree analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 高含硫、高压、高产的"三高"气田的钻完井事故概率计算是国内外钻完井事故风险评价中的重点和难点,为全面刻画事故发生机理,合理计算事故风险概率,针对三高气田钻完井阶段事故风险建立了事故树,结合事故树仿真方法和贝叶斯修正方法提出了三高气田钻完井事故风险概率评估方法,将现有现场统计资料和专家判断相结合,对基本事件失效率及失效概率进行统计推断,并利用Monte Carlo仿真得到井喷事故及相关事故的失效概率分布.实证结果表明,该研究方法有效弥补了因样本数据有限和经验判断差异带来的不确定性,可以为三高气田事故风险定量评价提供依据. The accident probability calculation of the gas fields with high sulfur content,high pressure,and high yield(3-highs) has been the focal and difficult point in risk assessment for gas well drilling accidents in China and abroad.In order to calculate the accident rate reasonably,the paper used the fault tree method and Bayesian updating to research the accident probability of the gas well drilling with 3-highs. Firstly,the paper described the mechanism of the accidents using fault tree analysis(FTA),then made use of Bayesian method to update existing statistic data for reducing uncertainty,and got the probability distributions of the top event and related incidents with Monte Carlo simulation finally.Empirical results show that the method could effectively reduce the uncertainty arisen from limited sample data and judge difference from experts,and could provide reference for quantitative risk assessment of the gas well drilling with 3-highs.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期877-884,共8页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70825001 71133005) 国家科技支撑计划(2008BAB37805-01)
关键词 事故树分析法(FTA) 事故概率 MONTE Carlo仿真 定量风险评价 井喷 fault tree analysis(FTA) accident probability Monte Carlo simulation quantitative risk assessment blowout
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献81

共引文献361

同被引文献34

  • 1刘大刚,郑中义,吴兆麟.大风浪中航行船舶风险体系分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(2):100-102. 被引量:18
  • 2N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2012(104) :36-44.
  • 3K. Durga Rao,V. Gopika,V. V. S. Sanyasi Rao,et al. Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009(94) : 872-883.
  • 4N. Khakzad,F. Khan, P. Amyotte. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Proteetion,2013(91) : 46-53.
  • 5A. Suprasad, D. Glenn, H. Eileen. A new approach to solve dynamic fault trees [C]. In.. Annual IEEE reliability and maintainability symposium, 2003 .. 374-379.
  • 6J. Chen, R. Yang. Analysis of mine water inrush accident based on FTA[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2011 (11) :1150-1554.
  • 7J. H. Purda, J. Lu, G. Zhang, et al. A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data processing [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2014 (243) : 50-69.
  • 8D. Wang,P. Zhang,L. Chen. Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013 (26) : 190-1398.
  • 9R. Jiang,D. N. P. Murthy. A study of Weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011,96(12) : 1619-1626.
  • 10J. Maiti,V. Khanzode,P. Ray. Severity analysis of Indian coal mine aceidents-a retrospective study for 100 years[J]. Safety Science,2009,47(7) : 1033-1042.

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部