期刊文献+

丙泊酚复合不同剂量阿芬太尼用于无痛人流术的临床观察 被引量:44

The clinical observation of the different doses of alfentanil combined to propofol anesthesia for abortion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察阿芬太尼联合丙泊酚用于无痛人流术的安全性与有效性。方法选择ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级拟在静脉全身麻醉下行无痛人流术患者90例,随机均分为三组:分别静注芬太尼1μg/kg(F1组)、阿芬太尼5μg/kg(F2组)、10μg/kg(F3组),泵注丙泊酚2.0 mg·kg^(-1)·min^(-1)直至改良清醒镇静(MOAA/S)评分为0分为止。记录注药前(T_1)、睫毛反射消失时(T_2)、手术开始时(T_3)、手术开始后1min(T_4)、术毕(T_5)及清醒时(T_6)的MAP、HR、SpO_2、SNAP指数(SI),各组丙泊酚的总用量、起效时间、手术时间、意识恢复时间、清醒时间,手术过程中体动反应,患者清醒后10、30 min的疼痛VAS评分,记录不良反应的发生率。结果 T_2时F1组S1明显低于F2、F3组,T_3时F2组MAP及SI均明显高于、HR明显快于F1、F3组(P<0.05),T_2、T_3时F3组的SpO_2明显低于F1组(P<0.05),但均在正常值范围。F3组丙泊酚总用量明显少于F1与F2组(P<0.05),F2、F3组起效时间、意识恢复时间、F3组的清醒时间均明显短于F1组(P<0.05),F2组发生体动反应的例数明显高于F1、F3组(P<0.05)。结论阿芬太尼10μg/kg与丙白酚联合用于无痛人流术是安全有效的。 Objective To observe the effectiveness and safety of alfentanil combined to propofol anesthesia for abortion. Methods Ninety ASA I or Ⅱ patients scheduled for elective abortion under total intravenous anesthesia were randomly assigned into three groups with 30 cases each. Group F1 received fentanyl 1μg/kg intravenously i. v, group F2 received alfentanil 5 /,g/kg i. v, and group F3 received alfentanil 10μg/kg i. v. Three groups were given 2.0 mg.kg-1 .min a of propofol until the responsiveness MOAA/S scale was zero. MAP, HR, SpO2 and SI were recorded before injection of test drug (T1), loss of the eyelash reflex(Te ), at the beginning of the operation (T3), 1 min after the operation (T4), at the end of the operation (T5) and awakening (T6). The total usage of propofol, onset time, time duration of surgery, recovery time and awakening time along with side effects were determined, Postoperative abdominal pain intensity was assessed at 10 and 30 min with VAS scale. Results Compared with group F1, SI increased at Te in groups F2 and F3 (P〈 0. 05). At Ta, MAP, HR and SI were higher in group F2 than those in groups F1 and F3 (P〈0. 05). StK)e was lower in group F3 than that in group F1 at T2 and Ta (P〈0. 05). The total dose of propofol was less in the group F3 compared with the other two groups (P〈0. 05). The onset time of propofol and recovery time in the groups F2 and F3 and the time to awakening in group F3 were shorter than those in group F1 (P〈0. 05). Patients moving in response to surgical stimulation in the group F2 were far more than those in groups F1 and F3 (P〈0. 05). Conclusion 10μg/kg alfentanil combined to propofol is an effective and safe anesthesia for abortion.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期249-251,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 阿芬太尼 丙泊酚 SNAP指数 无痛人流术 Alfentanil Propofol SNAP index Anesthesia of abortion
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Jakobsson J, Rane K. Anaesthesia for short outpatient procedures. A comparison between thiopentone and propofol in combination with fentanyl or alfentanil. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1995,39(4) : 503-507.
  • 2Schmidt GN, Bischoff P, Standl T, et al. SNAP index and Bispeetral index during different states of propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 2005,60(3): 228-234.
  • 3潘韫丹,郭曲练,钟涛.CSI在成人靶控输注异丙酚麻醉诱导中的监测及评价[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2006,31(3):437-440. 被引量:18
  • 4Avramov MN, White PF. Use of alfentanil and propofol for outpatient monitored anesthesia care: determining the optimal dosing regimen. Anesth Analg, 1997,85 (3) : 566-572.
  • 5艾登斌,马海燕主编.临床麻醉手册.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.205
  • 6董迎春,汪小海.丙泊酚与氯胺酮、芬太尼配伍用于无痛人工流产术的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(2):136-137. 被引量:87
  • 7王波,裴丽坚,黄宇光,罗爱伦,任洪智.SNAP指数监测瑞芬太尼-异丙酚麻醉患者镇静深度的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(5):394-396. 被引量:10
  • 8Ruiz-Gimeno P, Soro M, Perez-Solaz A,et al. Comparison of the EEG-based SNAP index and the Bispeetral (BIS) index during sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput, 2005,19 (6) : 383-389.
  • 9Wong CA, Fragen RJ, Fitzgerald PC, et al. The association between propofol-induced loss of consciousness and the SNAP index. Anesth Analg, 2005,100(1) : 141-148.
  • 10Lotsch J. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of opioids. J Pain and Symptom Manage,2005,29(5 Suppl) :s90- 103.

二级参考文献24

  • 1汤定荣,张小平,黄夕华.丙泊酚辅助胃镜检查的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2003,19(12):751-751. 被引量:36
  • 2曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.625-626.
  • 3Billard V,Moulla F,Bourgain TJ,et al. Hemodynamic response to induction and intubation. Propofol/fentanyl interaction. Anesthesiology, 1994,81 : 1384-1393.
  • 4Morton N, Johnson G, White M, et al. Propofol in paediatric.Anaesthesia, 1992,2: 89-97.
  • 5Foxex P. Cardiovascular effects of propofol. J Drug Dev, 1991,4,3.
  • 6Goodman NW,Black AM,Carter JA. Some ventilatory effects of propofol as sole anaesthetic agent. Br J Anaesth, 1987,59 : 1497-1503.
  • 7Chernik DA,Gillings D,Laine H,et al.Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale:study with intravenous midazolam[J].J Clin Psychopharmacol,1990,10(4):244-251.
  • 8Smith WD,Dutton RC,Smith NT.A measure of association for assessing prediction accuracy that is a generalization of non-parametric ROC area[J].Stat Med,1996,15(11):1199-1215.
  • 9Smith WD,Dutton RC,Smith NT.Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators[J].Anesthesiology,1996,84(1):38-51.
  • 10Bruhn J,Bouillon TW,Radulescu L,et al.Correlation of approximate entropy,bispectral index,and spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) with clinical signs of "anesthetic depth" during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil[J].Anesthesiology,2003,98(3):621-627.

共引文献112

同被引文献263

引证文献44

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部