摘要
尽管国资委各项政策整体上呈现出越来越清晰的态势,但七家中央企业集团总部各种缓冲方式以及外部政治经理频次和业务、职能经理频次并没有随之作出调整。U型、M型、SF(战略中心)型三种类型的集团总部管理组织结构的设置,也没有对高管角色的定位产生重大影响。作为具有国有企业特点的中央企业集团,要扭转集团高管外部价值创造和内部价值破坏的悖论局面,应该在SF型管理组织和主动政治式缓冲基础上,强化外部业务、职能经理和社会关系经理角色;外部政治经理角色更应规范化和专业化。
Although the SASAC policies as a whole has shown a trend of more and more clear, the way of the Group headquarters, the various buffering and the external political managers or business / functional managers do not follow the frequency to adjust. We also found the U-type, M-type, or SF-type, which was no significant impact to managers role. Finally, the article concludes: as a state-owned enterprise characteristics of the central enterprise group, should be in SF-type and should actively buffer to policies, strengthen business / functional managers and social relationship manager role. Meanwhile, the role of external political managers should be standardized and specialized. Under this, the paradox between external value creation and internal value damage would be changed.
出处
《改革》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期92-101,共10页
Reform
关键词
中央企业
企业集团
企业高管
国资委政策
central enterprises, enterprise group, top manager, the SASAC policy