期刊文献+

新婚夫妻婚前暴力社会心理因素探讨

The Psychosocial Risk Factors of Premarital Violence for Newly-married Couples
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解新婚登记夫妻婚前暴力的社会心理因素,为制定防止家庭暴力有关政策及心理干预提供科学的理论依据。方法采取横断面调查。于2005年11月—2006年2月在长沙市5个市辖区中抽取2个市辖区,再在每个市辖区对新婚登记夫妻进行自编的新婚夫妻婚前暴力调查问卷评估,仅限于初婚的夫妻。根据新婚夫妻报告在婚前1年至少有1次暴力的发生作为暴力家庭组(Spouse v iolence,SV组),有122对(244人);婚前1年双方都无暴力的发生作为非暴力家庭组(非SV组),195对(390人)。结果婚前暴力的前3位诱发因素是夫妻的个性与应对方式问题、沟通与交流不足、经济问题或工作问题。SV组同居、饮酒史、赌博高于非SV组(P<0.01)。SV组职业与非SV组比较,差异有显著性(P<0.05),其中干部或职员的比例(54.9%)明显高于非SV组(46.9%)(P<0.05)。结论新婚夫妻在婚前出现暴力的主要诱发因素是个性和/或应对方式问题、沟通与交流问题、经济问题或工作问题。婚前暴力与职业、同居、赌博、饮酒史均有一定的相关性。 Objective To explore the psychosocial risk factors of premarital violence,and provide foundation for spouse violence intervention.Methods By using cross-sectional survey,two of the five areas in Changsha city were randomly selected.The intimate partner violence(IPV) was assessed with a self-compiled inventory.We defined the SV groups when at least had once premarital violence,the others was in the non-SV group.Results The common reasons of premarital violence were personality trait,coping skills,poor communication and economic status.Premarital cohabitation,alcohol history,and gambling in SV group were more frequent than the no-SV group(P0.05,or P0.01).There was significant difference between SV group and no-SV group on employment(P0.05),in which the ratio of cadre or workers(54.9%)in SV group was higher than in no-SV group(46.9%).Conclusion The common reasons of premarital violence are personality trait,coping skills,poor communication and economic status.Premarital violence is correlated to employment,cohabitation,gambling,alcohol.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2012年第3期347-349,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 新婚夫妻 暴力 社会心理因素 婚前 Newly-married couples Violence Psychosocial factors Premarital
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Malcoe L H,Duran B M,Montgomery J M. Socioeconomic disparities in intimate partner violence against native American women:A cross-sectional study[J].BMC Medicine,2004,(02):20.doi:10.1186/1741-7015-2-20.
  • 2Tjaden P G,Thoennes N. Prevalence,incidence,and consequences of violence against women:Findings from the national violence against women survey[M].National Institute of Justice,Research in Brief,1998.1-16.
  • 3Garcia-Moreno C,Jansen H A,Ellsberg M. Prevalence of intimate partner violence:Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence[J].The Lancet,2006,(9543):1260-1269.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8.
  • 4Watts C,Zimmerman C. Violence against women:Global scope and magnitude[J].The Lancet,2002.1232-1237.
  • 5Staggs S L,Long S M,Mason G E. Intimate partner violence,social support,and employment in the post-welfare reform era[J].Journal of Interpersonal Violence,2007,(03):345-367.doi:10.1177/0886260506295388.
  • 6Murray A,Straus Sherry L,Hamb Y. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data[J].Journal of Family Issues,1996,(03):283-316.
  • 7Rao V. Wife-beating in rural south India:A qualitative and econometric analysis[J].Social Science & Medicine,1997,(08):1169-1180.doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00252-3.
  • 8Hoffman K L,Demo D H,Edwards J N. Physical wife abuse in a non-western society:An integrated theoretical approach[J].Journal of Marriage and the Family,1994.131-146.doi:10.2307/352709.
  • 9Stuart G L,Meehan J C,Moore T M. Examining a conceptual framework of intimate partner violence in men and women arrested for domestic violence[J].Journal of Studies on Alcohol,2006,(01):102-112.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部