期刊文献+

结构式写作应对高中生心理压力源的干预研究 被引量:4

Effect of Structured Writing Paradigm on Coping with Stressors of High School Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考察结构式写作对高中生心理压力源干预的有效性。方法以结构式写作处理50名高中生的150例心理压力事件,在干预前、干预3天和2周后被试完成情绪自评量表测评。结果①在150例心理压力事件中,学业类事件有88例(59%),课外类事件有40例(27%),情感类事件有12例(8%),其他类事件有10例(6%);②干预3天后被试的正性情绪分较干预前有显著差异(t=16.45,P<0.05);③干预3天后被试的负性情绪分较干预前有非常显著差异(t=1.07,P<0.01);④干预3天后被试的情绪总分较干预前有明显差异(t=15.99,P<0.05);⑤干预2周后被试的正性情绪分(t=17.84,P<0.05)、负性情绪分(t=8.45,P<0.01)和情绪总分(t=20.01,P<0.01)较干预前有显著差异。结论结构式写作对高中生心理压力源具有积极干预效应。 Objective To explore the effect of structured writing paradigm on coping with stressors of high school students.Methods Collect 150 life events written by 50 students,They were investigated by PANAS before structured writing paradigm and after three days or two weeks.Results ①In all of 150 events,the proportion of school work events,emotional events,extracurricular events and the other were 59%,27%,8% and 6%.②Scores of positive emotion changed significantly after three days(t=16.45,P〈0.05),③Scores of negative emotion changed significantly after three days(t=10.7,P〈0.01),④Scores of emotion changed significantly after three days(t=15.99,P〈0.05),⑤Scores of positive emotion(t=17.84,P〈0.05),negative emotion(t=8.45,P〈0.01) and emotion(t=20.01,P〈0.01) changed significantly after two weeks.Conclusion Effect of structured writing paradigm in coping with stressors of high school students is significantly effective.
作者 钱君 周详
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2012年第2期318-320,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 结构式写作 高中生 心理压力源 应对 Structured writing paradigm High school students Stressors Coping with
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1施铁如.写作的心理治疗与辅导:功能、原理及其应用[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006(1):116-121. 被引量:26
  • 2汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.134-142,161-167.
  • 3Pennebaker J, Kiecolt-Glaser J, Glaser R. Disclosure of trauma and immune function: Health implications for psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988, 56 (2) : 239-245.
  • 4Pennebaker J W. Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 1997, 8 (3) : 162-166.
  • 5Sloan D M, Marx B P. Taking pen to hand: Evaluating possible theories, underlying written disclosure paradigm. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2004, 11 (2) : 121-137.
  • 6Cameron L D, Nicholls G. Expression of stressful experiences through writing: Effects on a self-regulation manipulation for pessimists and optimists. Health Psychology, 1998, 17 (1) : 84-92.
  • 7Batten S V, Follette V M, Rasmussen Hall M L, et al. Physical and psychological effects of written disclosure among sexual abuse survivors. Behavior Therapy, 2002, 33 (1) : 107-122.
  • 8Bugg A, Turpin G, Mason S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of writing as a self-help intervention for traumatic injury patient at risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2009, 47 (1) : 6-12.
  • 9Guastella A J, Dadds M R. Cognitive-behavior models of emotion writing: A validation study. Conitive Therapy Research, 2006, 30 (3) : 397-414.
  • 10Guastella A J, Dadds M B. Cognitive-behavioral emotion writing tasks: A controlled trial of multiple processes. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2008, 39 (4) : 558-566.

共引文献2

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部