期刊文献+

美国陪审团的一致裁决原则:历史与当下 被引量:3

The Unanimity Requirement in Jury Verdicts in America:Past and Present
下载PDF
导出
摘要 陪审团的一致裁决原则起源于14世纪的英国,作为一项普通法的传统,它在美国确立后经历了一个联邦强制适用与各州选择适用并存这一局面被明确和强化的过程。虽然饱受质疑,但是从一致裁决原则对陪审团司法工具价值和政治民主价值的发挥及对审判成本控制的影响这三个角度出发综合考虑,其在一定时间内还将继续存在下去。 The unanimity requirement in the United States was adopted from the British system where it was employed beginning in the fourteenth century.It is a mandatory rule at the federal level while the states are free to accept or reject it.Admittedly there has been a large movement to eliminate the unanimity requirement,but taking its effect on verdict accuracy,local participatory democracy and tiral costs into consideration,it is more beneficial than detrimental to preserve the requirement.
作者 张鹏程
机构地区 广东商学院
出处 《时代法学》 2012年第2期108-119,共12页 Presentday Law Science
关键词 美国 陪审团 一致裁决原则 America jury the unanimity requirement
  • 相关文献

参考文献82

  • 1Michael H.Glasser,Letting the Supermajority Rule:Nonunaimous Jury Verdicts in Criminal Trials,24Florida State University Law Review,660(1997).
  • 2张鹏程.美国陪审团的秘密评议原则[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,44(3):102-108. 被引量:2
  • 3Edward P.Schwartz﹠Warren F.Schwartz,AndSo Say Some of Us……What to Do with When Jurors Disagree,9Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal,447(Spring,2000).
  • 4Ethan J.Leib,Supermajoritarianism and the American Criminal Jury,33Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly,168(Winter/Spring,2006).
  • 5Jeremy Osher,Jury Unanimity in California:Should It Say or Should It Go?,29Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review,1339(April,1996).
  • 6Edward P.Schwartz﹠Warren F.Schwartz,And So Say Some of Us……What to Do with When Jurors Disagree,9Southern California In-terdisciplinary Law Journal,447(Spring,2000).
  • 7Jere W.Morehead,A“Modest”Proposal for Jury Reform:The Elimination of Required Unanimous Jury Verdicts,46Kansas Law Review,935(June,1998).
  • 8Ethan J.Leib,Supermajoritarianism and the American Criminal Jury,33Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly,142(Winter/Spring,2006).
  • 9Jere W.Morehead,A“Modest”Proposal for Jury Reform:TheElimination of Required Unanimous Jury Verdicts,46Kansas Law Review,n.5(June,1998).
  • 10Michael H.Glasser,Letting the Supermajority Rule:Nonunaimous Jury Verdicts in Criminal Trials,24Florida State University Law Review,659(1997).

二级参考文献1

共引文献1

同被引文献65

  • 1高一飞.中美陪审制基本价值的比较——兼论我国新陪审制的出路[J].新疆社会科学,2005(5):79-86. 被引量:10
  • 2刘山鹰.试论民主的价值——以多数人统治和少数人统治的辨析为基点[J].政治学研究,2006(1):23-31. 被引量:8
  • 3People v. Rodriguez, 112 P. 3d 710.
  • 4Adam M. Chud & Michael L. Berman, Six- member juries: does size really matter, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 743,744(Spring,2000).
  • 5B. Thayer, The jury and its development, 5 Harv. L. R. 295(February 15, 1892).
  • 6Robert H. Miller, Six of one is not a dozen of the other: a reexamination of Williams v. Florida and the size of state criminal juries, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev. 621,632 ( January , 1998 ).
  • 7Robert H. Miller, Six of one is not a dozen of the other: a reexamination of Williams v. Florida and the size of state criminal juries, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev. 621,638 -639(January ,1998). Larry T. Bates, Trial by jury after Williams v. Florida,10 Hamline L. Rev. 61 (1987).
  • 8Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343.
  • 9Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343,346-347.
  • 10Thompson v. Utah, 170 U. S. 343,349 - 350 ( 1898 ).

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部