期刊文献+

An empirical study on travel demand management modeling based on discrete choice method 被引量:3

基于离散选择模型的交通需求管理建模实证研究(英文)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In view of the problem that the requirements of travel demand management and traffic policy-sensitivity are ignored during the establishment process of the travel demand forecasting model, a discrete-choice-based travel demand forecasting model is proposed to demonstrate its applicability to travel demand management. A car-bus discrete choice model is established, including three variables, i. e,, individual socioeconomic characteristics, time, and cost, and the traffic policy-sensitivity is evaluated through two kinds of traffic policies: parking charges and bus priorities. The empirical results show that travel choice is insensitive to the policy of parking charges as 88. 41% of the travelers are insensitive to parking charges; travel choice is, however, sensitive to the policy of bus priorities as 67.70% of the car travelers and 77.02% of the bus travelers are sensitive to bus priorities. The discrete-choice-based travel demand forecasting model is quite policy-sensitive and also has a good adaptability for travel demand management when meeting the basic functions of the demand forecasting model. 针对现有交通需求预测模型构建过程中忽视交通需求管理要求及缺乏政策敏感性等问题,建立了基于离散选择的交通需求预测模型并论证了其对交通需求管理的适应性. 建立包括个人社会经济特征、时间和价值3 个变量的私人小汽车-公交车离散选择模型,并通过停车收费和公交优先 2 种交通政策来评估模型的政策敏感性. 实证结果表明: 出行选择对停车收费政策敏感性不强,表现为 88. 41% 的出行者对停车收费政策不敏感; 出行选择对公交优先政策敏感性较强,表现为 67. 70% 的私家车出行者及 77. 02% 的公交车出行者对公交优先政策敏感. 基于离散选择模型的交通需求预测模型具有政策敏感性,在满足需求预测基本功能的同时对需求管理具有很好的适应性.
出处 《Journal of Southeast University(English Edition)》 EI CAS 2012年第1期106-111,共6页 东南大学学报(英文版)
关键词 discrete choice travel demand forecasting traveldemand management logit model 离散选择 交通需求预测 交通需求管理 logit模型
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Guan Hongzhi.Disaggregate model-analysis tools of traffic behavior[M]北京:人民交通出版社,2004119-120.
  • 2Train K E. Discrete choice methods with simulation[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.138-139,151-154.
  • 3Ben-Akiva M E,Lerman S R. Discrete choice analysis:the theory and application to travel demand[M].Cambridge,ma:the Mit Press,1987.252.
  • 4Hensher D A,Greene W H. The mixed logit model:the state of practice and warnings for the unwary[R].Sydney:Institute of Transport Studies of the University of Sydney,2001.
  • 5Domencich T A,McFadden D. Urban travel demand:a behavioral analysis[M].New York:American Elsevier Publishing Company,1975.65-69.
  • 6Cramer J S. The origin and development of the logit model[R].Amsterdam:University of Amsterdam and Tinbergen,2003.1-8.
  • 7Dong Xiaojing,Koppelman F S. Comparison of methods representing heterogeneity in logit models[A].Lucerne,Switzerland,2003.1-20.
  • 8Revelt D,Train K. Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit model[R].Berkeley,CA,USA:University of California at Berkeley,1999.3-10.
  • 9Hess S,Bierlaire M,Polak J W. Estimation of value of travel-time saving using mixed logit models[J].Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice,2005,(02):221-236.

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部