摘要
为比较PPH加外痔切剥术与传统外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效,将160例环状混合痔随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组80例采用PPH加外痔切剥术治疗,对照组80例采用传统外剥内扎术治疗。结果显示,治疗组术后平均住院时间短于对照组、术后并发症发生率及术后复发率均低于对照组(P〈0.05)。结果表明,PPH加外痔切剥术治疗环状混合痔疗效确切,术后恢复快,并发症少。
One hundred and sixty patients with circumferential mixed hemorrhoids(CMH) were randomized into two groups. Patients in the study group( n =80) underwent PPH plus dissection 8. resection of the external hemorrhoids(PPH plus DREH) ,while patients in the control group underwent traditional pro- cedure of external dissection & internal ligation(EDIL). As results,the average hospital stay,occurrence of postoperative complications and recurrence rate were less in the study group than in the control group( P 〈0.05). It is concluded that PPH plus DREH is a better procedure in terms of better therapeutic efficacy, more rapid recovery and less complications.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2012年第3期22-23,共2页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词
痔
吻合器痔上黏膜环切术
外剥内扎术
Hemorrhoid
PPH
Procedure of external dissection & internal ligation