期刊文献+

Simultaneous laparoscopic multi-organ resection combined with colorectal cancer:Comparison with non-combined surgery 被引量:6

Simultaneous laparoscopic multi-organ resection combined with colorectal cancer:Comparison with non-combined surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To access the short-term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery combined with resection for synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between March 1996 and April 2010 prospectively collected data were reviewed from 93 consecutive patients who had colorectal cancer and underwent simultaneous multiple organ resection (combined group) and 1090 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy or laparoscopic low/ anterior resection for colorectal cancer (non-combined group). In the combined group, there were nine gastric resections, three nephrectomies, nine adrenalectomies, 56 cholecystectomies, and 21 gynecologic resections. In addition, f ive patients underwent simultaneous laparoscopic resection for three organs. The patient demographics, intra-operative outcomes, surgical morbidity, and short-term outcomes were compared between thetwo groups (the combined and non-combined groups). RESULTS: There were no signifi cant differences in the clinicopathological variables between the two groups. The operating time was signifi cantly longer in the combined group than in the non-combined group, regardless of tumor location (laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic low/anterior resection groups; P = 0.048 and P < 0.001, respectively). The other intraoperative outcomes, such as the complications and open conversion rate, were similar in both groups. The rate of post-operative morbidity in the combined group was similar to the non-combined group (combined vs non-combined, 15.1% vs 13.5%, P = 0.667). Oncological safety for the colon and synchronous lesions were obtained in the combined group. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous laparoscopic multiple organ resection combined with colorectal cancer is a safe and feasible option in selected patients. AIM: To access the short-term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery combined with resection for synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between March 1996 and April 2010 prospectively collected data were reviewed from 93 consecutive patients who had colorectal cancer and underwent simultaneous multiple organ resection (combined group) and 1090 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy or laparoscopic low/ anterior resection for colorectal cancer (non-combined group). In the combined group, there were nine gastric resections, three nephrectomies, nine adrenalectomies, 56 cholecystectomies, and 21 gynecologic resections. In addition, f ive patients underwent simultaneous laparoscopic resection for three organs. The patient demographics, intra-operative outcomes, surgical morbidity, and short-term outcomes were compared between thetwo groups (the combined and non-combined groups). RESULTS: There were no signifi cant differences in the clinicopathological variables between the two groups. The operating time was signifi cantly longer in the combined group than in the non-combined group, regardless of tumor location (laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic low/anterior resection groups; P = 0.048 and P 〈 0.001, respectively). The other intraoperative outcomes, such as the complications and open conversion rate, were similar in both groups. The rate of post-operative morbidity in the combined group was similar to the non-combined group (combined vs non-combined, 15.1% vs 13.5%, P = 0.667). Oncological safety for the colon and synchronous lesions were obtained in the combined group. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous laparoscopic multiple organ resection combined with colorectal cancer is a safe and feasible option in selected patients.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第8期806-813,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 手术效果 切除术 腹腔镜 大肠癌 合并 脏器 并发症 结直肠癌 Laparoscopic combined resection Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Zhou ZG,Hu M,Li Y,Lei WZ,Yu YY,Cheng Z,Li L,Shu Y,Wang TC.Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer.Surg Endosc 2004;18:1211-1215
  • 2[2]Kitano S,Shiraishi N.Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors.Surg Clin North Am 2005;85:151-164,xi
  • 3[3]Guillou PJ,Quirke P,Thorpe H,Walker J,Jayne DG,Smith AM,Heath RM,Brown JM.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial.Lancet 2005;365:1718-1726
  • 4[4]Kitano S,Shiraishi N,Kakisako K,Yasuda K,Inomata M,Adachi Y.Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy (LADG) for cancer:our 10years' experience.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:204-207
  • 5[5]Leung KL,Lee JF,Yiu RY,Ng SS,Li JC.Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer and liver metastasis.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16:486-488
  • 6[6]Jafari Giv M,Ho YH.Concurrent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and ultra-low anterior resection with colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for synchronous carcinoma.Tech Coloproctol 2007;11:55-57

共引文献10

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部