期刊文献+

不同哺乳动物红细胞溶血替代眼刺激实验的比较 被引量:13

Comparison of hemolysis tests instead of eye irritation testing in different mammalians
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:哺乳动物红细胞溶血实验单独或组合使用可替代体内Draize兔眼实验,用于化合物眼刺激性的标识、筛查或机制研究。但目前尚不清楚不同物种间的红细胞差异是否会对实验结果造成影响。目的:比较大鼠和五指山小型猪血红细胞用于溶血实验的物质分类结果。方法:分别制备两种动物的红细胞悬液,进行红细胞溶血实验。分析溶血和蛋白变性两个毒性终点,得到50%溶血浓度HD50、蛋白变性指数DI及H/D比值3个参数值。结果与结论:经22种已知分类的眼刺激物检测表明,两种动物血样对化合物的分类差别无显著性意义(P>0.05)。Wilcoxon符号秩和检验小型猪血与大鼠血对物质分类差异无显著性意义(S=8,P=0.3047),经Kappa一致性检验,得出小型猪血和大鼠血的一致性一般[Kappa=0.4211,置信区间为(0.1433,0.6988)]。即种属差异对物质分类结果影响不大。 BACKGROUND:Alone or in combination of mammalian hemolysis test can replace Draize rabbit test in vivo to be used in the identity,screening and mechanical research of compound eye irritation.However,whether the differences in red blood cells(RBCs) between different species can affect the results is unclear.OBJECTIVE:To compare the substance classification of Wuzhishan micro-pig and rat red RBCs used in hemolysis test.METHODS:The RBC suspension from rat blood and Wuzhishan micro-pig blood was prepared for RBC hemolysis test.Toxicity endpoints of hemolysis and protein denaturation were analyzed in order to gain the 50% hemolytic dosage(HD50),protein denaturation index(DI),and the ratio of HD50/DI.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The eye irritation test of 22 known conference chemicals showed that the difference in substance classification of the two species of animals derived blood samples was not significant(P 0.05).The difference was also not significant in the Wilcoxon signed rank test(S=8,P=0.304 7).The Kappa consistency test showed a mediocre accordance between the micro-pig blood and the rat blood [Kappa = 0.421 1,confidence interval(0.143 3,0.698 8)].It is indicated that the species differences contribute little to the results.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2012年第12期2163-2166,共4页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2009B060300013),课题名称:动物实验替代技术评估与共享~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1程树军;焦红.实验动物替代方法原理与应用[M]北京:科学出版社,2010285-304.
  • 2ECVAM. ECVAM DB-ALM:INVITOX Protoco,Red blood cells test system[A].Ispra,Italy:ECVAM,1994.
  • 3Lagarto A,Vega R,Vega Y. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test[J].Toxicology in Vitro,2006,(04):529-533.doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2005.10.001.
  • 4廖艳,王雪,张立实,李冠民,张宝旭.血红蛋白变性试验替代眼刺激试验的实验研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2004,35(5):654-657. 被引量:2
  • 5Brantom PG,Bruner LH,Chamberlain M. A Summary Report of the COLIPA International Validation Study on Alternatives to the Draize Rabbit Eye Test[J].Toxicology in Vitro,1997.141-179.
  • 6Ying Y,Xingfen Y,Wengai Z. Combined in vitro tests as an alternative to in vivo eye irritation tests[J].Alternatives to Laboratory Animals,2010,(04):303-314.
  • 7Hagino S,Okazaki Y,Itagaki H. An in vitro tier evaluation for the identification of cosmetic ingredients which are not ocular irritants[J].Alternatives to Laboratory Animals,2008,(06):641-652.
  • 8Cruz-Monteagudo M,González-Díaz H,Borges F. Simple stochastic fingerprints towards mathematical modeling in biology and medicine.3.Ocular irritability classification model[J].Bulletin of Mathematical Biology,2006,(07):1555-1572.
  • 9Creton S,Dewhurst IC,Earl LK. Acute toxicity testing of chemicals-Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches[J].Critical Reviews in Toxicology,2010,(01):50-83.
  • 10Seaman CW,Whittingham A,Guest R. An evaluation of a cultured human corneal epithelial tissue model for the determination of the ocular irritation potential of pharmaceutical process materials[J].Toxicology in Vitro,2010,(06):1862-1870.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Patrick E, Maibach HI. Comparison of the time course, dose response, and mediators of chemically induced skin irritation in three species. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, et al, eds. Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. New York: Springer
  • 2Balls M, Riddell R J, Worden A N. Animal and Alternatives in Toxicity Testing. 1st ed. London: Academic Press,1983:84
  • 3Miyazawa K, Ogawa M, Mitsui T. The physicochemical prop-erties and protein denaturation potential of surfactant mixtures. International Journal of Cosmetic Science,1984;6(1):33.
  • 4Balls M, Worden AN, Riddell RJ, et al. Report and recommendation of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. ATLA,1990;18(3):318.
  • 5Hatao M, Murakami N, Sakamoto K, et al. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (4) Haemoglobin denaturation test. Toxicology in vitro,1999;13(2):125.
  • 6Ohno Y, Kaneko T, Inoue T, et al. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. Toxicology in vitro,1999;13(1):73.
  • 7Harbell JW, Koontz SW, Lewis RW, et al. IRAG Working Group 4 Cell cytotoxicity assays. Food and Chemical Toxicology,1997;35(1):79.
  • 8廖艳,王雪,张立实,李冠民,张宝旭.溶血试验作为眼刺激试验替代方法的研究[J].现代预防医学,2002,29(4):593-595. 被引量:25

共引文献1

同被引文献98

引证文献13

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部