期刊文献+

新兴市场合资企业R&D强度与企业绩效或有关系及调整——厦门、长沙与重庆三地300家合资企业的调查研究 被引量:1

The Contingent Relationship and Adjustment between R&D investment Intensity and Enterprise Performance of Joint Venture in Emerging Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 MNCs(跨国公司)通过组建合资企业进入新兴市场,由于其R&D活动面临着创新专用性风险,使其R&D强度与合资企业绩效之间表现为一种或有关系。使用厦门、长沙和重庆3地制造业样本检验验证了该理论假设。就市场战略而言,只有那些以国际市场战略为主的合资企业才能获得R&D对合资企业绩效的促进效应;进一步考虑合资企业不同的所有权结构——市场战略配置结构,发现只有在以国际市场战略——MNCs占绝对多数股权的合资企业中,R&D强度对企业绩效的促进效应才会显现,而其它任何类型的配置结构均没有发现这种促进效应。这些发现可为中国完善外资政策提供理论指导。 When multinational corporations enter emerging markets by the way of joint venture, there is a contingent rela tionship between R&D investment intensity and enterprise performance,for the innovational appropriability hazard. Sam ple inspection data of manufacture industry in China support this theory hypothesis. We find that R&D intensity is posi tively related to enterprise performance in export market but of foreign policy and outward direct investment for China. not in local market. These findings contribute to knowledge
作者 杨勇 骆永菊
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第8期75-80,共6页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(09BJY012) 重庆三峡学院教授博士资助计划及引进计划项目(10ZD-06)
关键词 R&D投入强度 创新专用性风险 技术外溢 合资企业 R & D Intensity Innovation Appropriability Hazard Technologic Spillover Joint-Venture
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1ZHAO M. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection[J].Management Science,2006,(08):1185-1199.
  • 2BELDERBOS R. Entry mode,organizational learning,and R&D in foreign affiliates:evidence from Japanese firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2003,(03):235-259.doi:10.1002/smj.294.
  • 3LUO Y. Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market:implications for multinational enterprises[J].Organization Science,2002,(01):48-63.doi:10.1287/orsc.13.1.48.538.
  • 4MANSFIELD E,ROMEO A. Technology transfer to overseas subsidiaries by US-based firms[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1980,(04):737-750.doi:10.2307/1885489.
  • 5ZEJAN M C. R&D activities in affiliates of Swedish multinational enterprises,Scandinavian[J].Journal of Economics,1990,(03):487-500.
  • 6FRANKO L. Global corporate competition:who's winning,who's losing,and the R&D factor as one reason why[J].Strategic Management Journal,1989,(05):449-474.doi:10.1002/smj.4250100505.
  • 7LICHTENBERG F R,SIEGEL D. The impact of R&D investment on productivity,new evidence using linked R&D LRD data[J].Economic Inquiry,1991,(02):203-229.doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb01267.x.
  • 8EBERHART A,MAXWELL W,SIDDIQUE A. An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operatingperformance following R&D increases[J].Journal of Finance,2004,(02):623-650.
  • 9MORBEY G K. R&D expenditures and profit growth[J].Research Technology Management,1989,(03):20-23.
  • 10GRAVES S,LANGOWITZ N. Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry[J].Strategic Management Journal,1993,(08):593-605.doi:10.1002/smj.4250140803.

二级参考文献44

  • 1葛泽慧,胡其英.具有内生技术共享的合作研发决策分析[J].科研管理,2006,27(5):45-52. 被引量:14
  • 2侯光明,艾凤义.基于混合溢出的双寡头横向R&D合作[J].管理工程学报,2006,20(4):94-97. 被引量:57
  • 3郭焱,郭彬.不同竞合模式的战略联盟形式选择[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(1):39-45. 被引量:34
  • 4Katz ML.An analysis of cooperative research and development[J].Rand Journal of Economics,1986,17(4):527-543.
  • 5Tirole J.The Theoty of Industry Opganization[B].Cambridge,MIT press,1968.
  • 6Poyago-Theotoky J.Equilibrium and optimal size of a research joint venture in an oligopoly with spillovers[J].Journal of Industrial Economics,1995,43(2):209-226.
  • 7D'Aspremont C,Jacquemin A.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review,1988,78(5):1133-1140.
  • 8Amir R.Modeling imperfectly appropriable B&D via spillovers[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2000,18(7):1013-1032.
  • 9Kamnien MI,Muller E,Zang I.Research joint venture and R&D cartels[J].American Economic Review,1992,82(5):1293-1306.
  • 10De Bondt R,Henriques I.Strategic investment with asymmetric spillovers[J].Canadian Journal of Economicas 1995,28(3):656-674.

共引文献59

同被引文献25

  • 1张小蒂,朱勤.论全球价值链中我国企业创新与市场势力构建的良性互动[J].工业经济,2007(8):25-32. 被引量:83
  • 2Li H, Atuahene-Gima K. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures [ J ]. Strategic Man- agement Journal, 2002,23 (6) :469-490.
  • 3Li Y, Su Z, Liu Y. Can strategic flexibility help firms profit from product innovation .9 [ J ]. Technovation, 2010,30 (5/6) : 300-309.
  • 4Rosenbusch N, Brinckmann J, Bausch A. Is innova- tion always beneficial.9 A meta-analysis of the rela- tionship between innovation and performance in SMEs [ J ] . Journal of Business Venturing, 2011,26 (4) : 441-457.
  • 5Capon N, Farley J U, Hoenig S. Determinants of fi- nancial performance : A meta-analysis [ J ]. Manage- ment Science, 1990,36(I0) :1143-1159.
  • 6Teece D J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy [ J ]. Research Policy, 1986, 15 (6) :285-305.
  • 7Zhang Y, Li H, Hitt M A, Cui G. R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market : Moderating effects of market focus and own- ership structure [ J ]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007,38 (6) :944-960.
  • 8Su Z, Xie E, Liu H, Sun W. Profiting from product innovation : The impact of legal, marketing, and tech- nological capabilities in different environmental condi- tions [ J ]. Marketing Letters, 2013,24 ( 3 ) : 261- 276.
  • 9Chiu Y C, Lai H C, Lee T Y, Liaw Y C. Technologi- cal diversification, complementary assets, and per- formance [ J ] . Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008.75 ( 6 ) :875-892.
  • 10Keupp M M, Beckenbauer A, Gassmann O. Enforcing intellectual property rights in weak appropriability re- gimes:The case of de facto protection strategies in China [ J ]. Management International Review, 2010, 50(1) :109-130.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部