期刊文献+

作为研究者的管理者:链接理论与实践的重要桥梁 被引量:7

Managers as Researchers:Bridging the Relevance Gap
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不仅理论本身的原因会导致理论与实践的脱节,管理者不愿意使用理论或者不正确使用理论也会造成理论与实践的脱节,因此对管理者实践逻辑本身的分析就非常必要。基于对管理者实践逻辑的分析,管理者不仅应作为研究对象进入研究过程,即对管理者的实践智慧进行研究、吸纳和提炼,而且应作为研究主体进入研究过程。弥合管理理论与实践的距离,不仅要基于实践的逻辑去构建理论,更要研究实践者如何才能成为一个高效的研究者。 The relevance gap is not only caused by the theories that are lack of practical consideration,but also caused by managers' unwillingness or improper use of scientific theories.Therefore,to solve this problem,it is necessary to reveal the real logic of management practices.Based on the analyses of logic of management practice,the author argues that the managers should not only be treated as research object,but also should be treated as research subject.To bridge the relevance gap,we should not only investigate the logic and phronesis of management practice,produce practice-based theories,but also study how practitioners to be effective practice researchers.
作者 彭贺
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期637-641,共5页 Chinese Journal of Management
关键词 反思 管理理论 管理实践 reflective thinking management theory management practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1彭贺.管理研究与实践脱节的原因以及应对策略[J].管理评论,2011,23(2):122-128. 被引量:8
  • 2亚里士多德.形而上学[M].吴寿彭,译.北京:商务印书馆,2011.
  • 3SANDBERG J, TSOUKAS H. Grasping the Logic of Practice: Theorizing Through Practical Rationality [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011,36(2): 338-360.
  • 4DREYFUS H L. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger' s Being and Time Division I [M]. Cambridge MA .. MIT Press, 1991.
  • 5DEWEY J. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry [M]. New York: Henry Holt,1938.
  • 6杜威J.民主主义与教育[M].王承绪,译.北京:人民教育出版社,1990.
  • 7舍恩DA.反映的实践者:专业工作者如何在行动中恩考[M].夏林清,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2007.
  • 8舍恩DA.培养反映的实践者[M].郝彩虹,张玉荣,雷月梅,等,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2008.
  • 9ROUSSEAU D M. Is There Such a Thing as "Evi- dence-Based Management"? [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(2)..256-269.
  • 10阿吉里斯C,舍恩DA.实践理论:提高专业效能[M].邢清清,赵宁宁,译.北京:教育科学出版社,2008.

二级参考文献16

  • 1刘源张.中国管理学的道路——从与经济学的比较说起[J].管理评论,2006,18(12):3-7. 被引量:18
  • 2Bennis, W. G., J.O'Toole. How Business Schools Lost Their Way[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2005,83(5):96-104.
  • 3Mintzberg, H. Musings on Management[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1996,74(4):61-67.
  • 4Elster, J. Explaining Technical Change[M]. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 5Tsui, A. From Homogenization to Pluralism: International Management Research in The Academy and Beyond [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50(6):1353-1364.
  • 6Luthans, F. Successful vs. Effective Real Managers[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1988,2(2):127-132.
  • 7Rynes, S. L., T. L. Giluk, K. G. Brown. The Very Separate Worlds of Academic and Practitioner Publications in Human Resource Management: Implications for Evidence-based Management[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50:987-1008.
  • 8Agarwal, R., G. Hoetker. A Faustian Bargain? The Growth of Management and Its Relationship with Related Disciplines[J]. Acade-my of Management Journal, 2007,50(6):1304-1322.
  • 9Hatch,J.A.著,朱光明等译.如何做质的研究[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007.
  • 10Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy(COSEPUP). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research[R]. Washington DC: Na- tional Academies Press, 2004.

共引文献10

同被引文献126

引证文献7

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部