期刊文献+

油气管道机械损伤的完整性研究进展 被引量:8

Progress in the integrity research of mechanical damage of oil and gas pipelines
原文传递
导出
摘要 机械损伤是导致管道事故的主要原因,对其进行完整性管理一直是管道业界的难题。基于国内外事故案例,介绍了管道机械损伤的危害性和特殊性。从评价技术、管理技术和标准规范3个方面回顾了国内外关于管道机械损伤完整性的研究历程,虽然取得一些进展,但迄今尚无一个权威性指南可供指导应用实践。分析了管道机械损伤在检测、识别、评价3个方面需要解决的技术难题,针对机械损伤完整性管理研究策略,提出了评估-缓解-预防研究路线图,给出了不同专题各个领域的重点研究内容。 Mechanical damage is the main reason led to pipeline accidents,and the integrity management on it has always been a difficult problem in the pipeline industry.Based on the pipelines' accident cases at home and abroad,the hazards and characteristics of pipeline mechanical damage are introduced.The research process in the integrity of pipeline mechanical damage worldwide is reviewed from evaluation technology,management technology and standards.Although some progress is achieved,so far there has been no authoritative guideline available to instruct the application practice.Technical problems to be solved in pipeline mechanical damage in detection,identification and evaluation are analyzed.For the research strategies in the integrity management of pipeline's mechanical damage,a research line diagram of 'assessment-mitigation-prevention' is proposed,and key contents in different research fields about special subjects of mechanical damage of pipelines are given.
出处 《油气储运》 CAS 2012年第4期241-245,327,共5页 Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
关键词 油气管道 机械损伤 完整性 研究进展 技术难题 研究策略 oil and gas pipeline,mechanical damage,integrity,research progress,technical problem,research strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Chen Q,Davis K,Parker C. Modeling damage prevention effectiveness based on industry practices and regulatory framework IPC2006-10433[R].
  • 2董保胜,赵新伟,陈宏达,冯耀荣,路民旭.西气东输管线第三方损伤预测[J].管道技术与设备,2004(2):15-16. 被引量:8
  • 3Martin M,Andrews R. A time dependent model for assessing the significance of mechanical damage IPC2006-10141[R].
  • 4Malatesta G,Mammicci G,Demofonti G. An experimental and analytic approach for predicting the formation of dent and gouges damage on gas pipeline by an excavator[A].Aberystwyth,UK:Cambrian Printers,2004.917-927.
  • 5Warrman D J,Rapp S,Travers B. Management of pipeline dents and mechanical damage in gas pipelines IPC2006-10407[R].
  • 6Vieth P,Maier C,Harper W V. Probabilistic assessment of minor mechanical damage IPC2006-10409[R].
  • 7Roserfeld M J,Beckett A,Neogi B. Deterministic assessment of minor mechanical damage on pipelines IPC2006-10513[R].
  • 8李秀峰,何仁洋,刘长征,孟涛,孙亮,赵世佳.在役埋地原油管道机械撞击损伤缺陷安全评定[J].化工设备与管道,2006,43(2):50-52. 被引量:4
  • 9张善元,路国运,程国强,雷建平.圆管及内充压力介质管道撞击大变形与破坏[J].力学进展,2004,34(1):23-31. 被引量:23
  • 10伍颖,张鹏,彭星煜,马俊.管道中沟槽型凹痕缺陷破裂强度评估方法[J].压力容器,2009,26(4):47-50. 被引量:11

二级参考文献72

  • 1Wang Deyu and Zhang Shanyuan Associate Prof., Depart, of Naval Archi. and Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030 Prof., Research Institute of Applied Mechanics, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024.Shear Failure of a Clamped Dented Tubular Beam Under Lateral Impact[J].China Ocean Engineering,1996,11(2):161-168. 被引量:1
  • 2范贤振,刘益东.在役氨系统管线缺陷评定的应用[J].化工设备与管道,2005,42(3):32-34. 被引量:4
  • 3杨理践.管道漏磁在线检测技术[J].沈阳工业大学学报,2005,27(5):522-525. 被引量:36
  • 4陆俭伟,吕干霖,黎宗潼,杨松章.管材超声探伤中缺陷模糊模式识别方法研究[J].声学学报,1996,21(1):20-28. 被引量:7
  • 5Rosenfeld, Michael J. Here are Factors that Govern Evaluation of Mechanical Damage to Pipelines [ J ]. The Oil and Gas, 2002, 100(37) :64 -69.
  • 6Leis, B N, Bubenik, T A, Francini. Recent Developments in Avoiding, Detecting and Assessing Severity of Mechanical Damage[ C ]. Proceedings of the Third International Pipeline Technology Conference. Brugge, Belgium, 2000.
  • 7Leis,B N,Francini, R B. Linepipe Resistance to Outside Force - Volume Two : Assessing Serviceability of Mechanical Damage[ R]. Final Report on Project PR 3 -9305 to the Line Pipe Research Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Council International. Battelle, 1999.
  • 8Maxey W A. Outside Force Defect Behaviors. Report to Line Pipe Research Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association [R]. NG - 18 Report No. 162, AGA Catalogue No. L51518, Battelle, 1986.
  • 9Mayfield M, E Maxey, W A, Fracture Initiation Tolerance of Line Pipe[ C]. 6^th Symposium on Line Pipe Research. American Gas Association, Houston, Texas, 1979.
  • 10Roovers P, Bood R Galli, M Marewski, U. EPRG Methods for Assessing the Tolerance and Resistance of Pipe- lines to External Damage [ C ]. Proceedings of the Third International Pipeline Technology Conference. Brugge, Belgium, 2000.

共引文献46

同被引文献76

  • 1徐涛龙,曾祥国,姚安林,陈华燕.夯击载荷作用下埋地输气管道的可靠度分析[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2012,44(S2):96-100. 被引量:10
  • 2李秀峰,何仁洋,刘长征,孟涛,孙亮,赵世佳.在役埋地原油管道机械撞击损伤缺陷安全评定[J].化工设备与管道,2006,43(2):50-52. 被引量:4
  • 3李鹤林,赵新伟,吉玲康.油气管道失效分析与完整性管理[J].油气储运,2005,24(B12):1-7. 被引量:25
  • 4陆春芸.液压挖掘机动力学研究[J].武汉冶金科技大学学报,1996,19(4):476-481. 被引量:2
  • 5Muhlbauer W K.Pipeline risk management manual [M].Second Edition.Houston,TX:Gulf Publishing Company,1996.
  • 6Bolt R. Database reflects recent trends. Oil Gas J 2001;48–54.
  • 7Jones D, Kramer G, Gideon D, Eiber R. An analysis of reportable incidents for natural gas transmission and gathering lines 1970 through June 1984. Technical report 158. Battelle Columbus Division; 1986.
  • 8Roovers P, Steiner M, Zarea M. EPRG recommendations for the assessment of the tolerance and resistance of pipelines to external damage [ R]. European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG) Paper 21. 11th PRCI/EPRG Joint Technical Meet- ing Arlington Virginia, April 1997.
  • 9Champavere R, Dezobry J, Philibert C, et al. The pipe ag- gression rig: A eomprehensive means for studying pipe resist- ance to third party damage[ R]. European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG) Paper 22. 11th PRCI/EPRG Joint Techniecal Meeting Arlington Virginia, April 1997.
  • 10Zarea M, Deo I, Philibert C. Full scale experimental ap- proach of gas transmission pipeline resistance to dynamic puncture[ R]. European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG) Paper 23.11 th PRCI/EPRG Joint Technical Meeting Arling- ton Virginia, April 1997.

引证文献8

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部