期刊文献+

Estimating Ecological Value of Small Hydropower Using Contingent Valuation Method:An Application to Tongjiqiao Reservoir in Zhejiang Province,China 被引量:1

Estimating Ecological Value of Small Hydropower Using Contingent Valuation Method:An Application to Tongjiqiao Reservoir in Zhejiang Province,China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The small hydropower(SHP) will be less competitive in the absence of environmental value.The lack of information has become an important obstacle challenging decision-makers in resource-use choices.This paper is an application of contingent valuation method(CVM) in rural China to estimate the willingness-to-pay(WTP) for environmental services provided by exiting hydropower station.Using the single-bounded and dichotomouschoice CVM,the ecological value of Tongjiqiao Reservoir(TJQR) is estimated,and the annual mean WTPs of single-bounded and double-bounded CVM estimation are 141.05 and 219.52 Yuan(RMB)/a,respectively.The 95% confidence interval of annual WTP on an average is 118.47,166.79 Yuan(RMB)/a and 204.41,236.22(Yuan RMB)/a,respectively.In contrast,double-bounded model could obtain much more information of WTP of the investigated,thus reducing the confidence interval of estimation,and enhancing the estimation accuracy of the WTP.According to the estimated mean WTP of the double-bounded CVM,the total ecosystem service value of the TJQR is 15.54 million Yuan(RMB).Compared with the conventional electricity of fossil power and large hydropower,the SHP will be less competitive in the absence of non-market value,ignoring that the environmental impacts of existing SHP will undermine the healthy development of clean energy sector. The small hydropower (SHP) will be less competitive in the absence of environmental value. The lack of information has become an important obstacle challenging decision-makers in resource-use choices. This paper is an application of contingent valuation method (CVM) in rural China to estimate the willing- ness-to-pay (WTP) for environmental services provided by exiting hydropower station. Using the single-bounded and dichotomous- choice CVM, the ecological value of Tongjiqiao Reservoir (TJQR) is estimated, and the annual mean WTPs of single-bounded and double-bounded CVM estimation are 141.05 and 219.52 Yuan (RMB)/a, respectively. The 95% confidence interval of annual WTP on an average is 118.47, 166.79 Yuan (RMB)/a and 204.41, 236.22 (Yuan RMB)/a, respectively. In contrast, double-bounded model could obtain much more information of WTP of the inves- tigated, thus reducing the confidence interval of estimation, and enhancing the estimation accuracy of the WTP. According to the estimated mean WTP of the double-bounded CVM, the total eco- system service value of the TJQR is 15.54 million Yuan (RMB). Compared with the conventional electricity of fossil power and large hydropower, the SHP will be less competitive in the absence of non-market value, ignoring that the environmental impacts of existing SHP will undermine the healthy development of clean energy sector.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment》 2012年第1期87-95,共9页 中国人口·资源与环境(英文版)
基金 supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2008 (Grant No. 70873108) Zhejiang Provincial Natural Scien8ce Foundation of China (Grant No. Z607126) the key research project funded by a national key research base for humanities and social sciences under the guidance of the Ministry of Education (Grant No. 2007JJD630014) Programfor New Century Excellent Talents in University in 2008
关键词 小水电代燃料 估计精度 生态价值 中国农村 估值 应用 水库 生态系统服务价值 small hydropower, ecosystem service, contingentvaluation method, WTP
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Bennett J, Blarney R, 2001. The strengths and weaknesses of environmental choice modeling. In: Bennett J, Blarney R, eds., The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 227-242.
  • 2Boyle K J, Bishop R C, Welsh M P, 1985. Starting point bias in contingent valuation bidding games. Land Economics, 61(2): 188- 194.
  • 3Boyle K, Johnson F, McCollum D, 1997. Anchoring and adjustment in single-bounded, contingent-valuation questions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79:1495-1500.
  • 4Burton A C, Carson K S, Chilton S M, et al., 2003. An experimental investigation of explanation for inconsistencies in responses to second offers in double referenda. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46:472-489.
  • 5Cameron T A, Quiggin J, 1994. Estimating using contingent valuation data from a 'dichotomous choice with follow-up' questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24:218- 234.
  • 6Carson R T, Richard T, Flores N E, et al., 2001. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19:173-210.
  • 7Carson R T, Groves T, 2007. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1): 181-210.
  • 8Costanza R, D'Arge R, de-Groot R, et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1): 3-15.
  • 9Freeman III M A, 1993. The measurement of environmental and resource values. Washington, DC: Resource for the Future.
  • 10Feather P M, 1994. Sampling and aggregation issues in random utility model estimation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(4): 772-780.

同被引文献22

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部