期刊文献+

不明原因复发性自然流产患者外周血淋巴细胞亚群特征的研究 被引量:2

Characteristics investigation of lymphocyte subgroups in peripheral blood of patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不明原因复发性自然流产患者外周血免疫细胞亚群的特征。方法将34例早孕难免流产患者分为不明原因复发性自然流产(URSA)和偶发性自然流产(SA)两组,采用流式细胞术检测患者外周血免疫细胞的特征,将两组的检测结果进行比对研究。结果 Th/Ts两组均见异常升高,URSA组为(2.77±5.16),SA组为(3.67±6.12);NK细胞比例URSA组为(15.57±6.45)%明显升高,而SA组仅为(11.38±3.66)%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 URSA组与SA组均存在一定的免疫紊乱,共同的表现是特异性免疫方面均有Th/Ts异常升高,不同的表现是URSA组在非特异性免疫方面NK细胞比例增高较SA组更为明显。 Objective To investigate the characteristics of lymphocyte subgroups in peripheral blood of patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion(URSA) .Methods 34 cases of patients at early stage of pregnancy and with inevitable abortion were divided into tow groups,including URSA group and sporadic spontaneous abortion group(SA group) .Flow cytometry was performed to detect characteristics of lymphocyte subgroups in peripheral blood.Results of the two groups were compared.Results Increasing of helper T cells(Th) /suppressor T cells(Ts) could be demonstrated in both groups,with(2.77±5.16) in URSA group and(3.67±6.12) in SA group.Proportion of natural killer(NK) cells in URSA group and SA group was(15.57±6.45) % and(11.38±3.66) % respective,and with statistical difference between the two groups(P0.05) .Conclusion Patients with URSA and SA might be with certain degree of immunologic derangement,demonstrated as the increasing of Th/Ts.But according to nonspecific immunity,increasing of the proportion of NK cells might be more obvious in URSA group than that in SA group.
作者 刘瑞霞 王芳
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第8期910-911,共2页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 流产 自然 淋巴细胞亚群 流式细胞术 abortion spontaneous lymphocyte subsets flow cytometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献87

  • 1[2]Crispin JC,Vargus MI,Alcecer-Varela J.Immunoregnlamry T cells in autoimmunity[J].Autoimmun Rev,2004,3:45 -51.
  • 2[3]Sakaguchi S.Naturally arising CD4 + regulatory t ceils for immunologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses[J].Annu Rev Immunol,2004,22:531-562.
  • 3[4]von Boehmer H.Mechanisms of suppression by suppressor T cells[J].Nat Immunol,2005,6(4):338 -344.
  • 4[5]Sundstedt A,O'Neill EJ,Nicolson KS,et al.Role for IL-10 in suppression mediated by peptide-induced regulatory T cells in vivo[J].J Immunol,2003,170(3):1240 -1248.
  • 5[6]Bmnkow ME,et al.Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein,scurfin,results in the fatal lymphoproliferafive disorder of the scurfy mouse[J].Nat Genet,2001,27(1):68 -73.
  • 6[7]Fontenot JD,Gavin MA,Rudensky AY.Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells[J].Nat Immunol,2003,4(4):330 -336.
  • 7[8]Fehervari Z,Sakaguchi S.Development and function of CD25 + CD4+ regulatory T cells[J].Curr Opin Immunol,2004,16(2):203.
  • 8[9]Walker MR,Kasprowiez DJ,Gersuk VH,et al.Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4 +CD25-T ceils[J].J Clin Invest,2003,112(9):1437-1443.
  • 9[10]Ramsdell F.Foxp3 and natural regulatory T cells:key to a cell lineage?[J].Immunity,2003,19(2):165 -168.
  • 10Kwak-Kim J,Gilman-Sachs A.Clinical implication of natural killer cells and reproduction[J].Am J Reprod Immunol,2008,59(5):388-400.

共引文献423

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部