摘要
会话分析和批评话语分析都将自然话语视为对社会的反映,都以话语为媒介考察社会对话语生成的影响,但由于对话语及社会本质的认识不同,二者的方法论也不尽相同。梳理两个流派的异同点可加深对话语社会特性的认识,同时也有助于整合话语分析各流派的理论及研究方法,推动话语研究的深入发展。
Conversation analysis and critical discourse analysis both regard natural conversations as the reflection of the society. They both take conversations as the media to examine the effects of society on conversation. However, duo to different attitudes towards conversations and social essence, they apply different methodologies. Examining the similarities and differences of these two methods may enhance our understanding of the social characteristics of conversations. Furthermore, it may benefit the integration of various schools and methodologies in this area and enhance the development of discourse research.
出处
《教育文化论坛》
2012年第1期69-74,共6页
Tribune of Education Culture
关键词
会话分析
批评话语分析
语言观
方法论
conversation analysis
critical discourse analysis
language view
methodology
