摘要
目的比较水合氯醛两种给药途径用于婴幼儿检查前镇静的效果。方法将176例检查前需要水合氯醛镇静的婴幼儿随机分为口服组88例和肛门注入组88例,分析镇静效果与镇静起效时间。结果水合氯醛肛门注入镇静效果明显优于口服效果,水合氯醛肛门注入镇静起效时间优于口服给药。结论水合氯醛肛门注入镇静效果确切可靠,操作简单,经济实用,疗效佳,值得在临床检查前需要镇静的婴幼儿中使用。
Objective To compare the anesthetic effects of chloral hydrate given by oral and clysis routes in infants.Methods One hundred and seventy-six cases of inspection prior to chlorine aldehyde calm the infant of hydration randomly divided into oral group in 88 cases and the anus injection group in 88 cases,the calm effect and calm work time were analyzed.Results The effect in hydration chlorine aldehyde anal injection calm was significantly better than oral effect,and the work time in hydration chlorine aldehyde anal injection calm was better than that of oral group.Conclusion Hydration chlorine aldehyde anus calmness effect into exactly reliable,simple operation,economic and practical,good curative effect,it is worth in clinical examination to calm before the infant of use.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2012年第12期59-60,共2页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
水合氯醛
口服
肛门注入
婴幼儿
Chloral hydrate
Oral routes
Clysis routes
Infant
