期刊文献+

正畸托槽脱落后两种底板处理方法对比分析 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用喷砂法和磨除法处理正畸托槽脱落后的底板的差异。方法选取我院于2011年1月至2011年11月收治的92例双尖牙托槽脱落患者,按照随机的原则平均分为两组,其中喷砂组46例,共70个牙位;磨除组46例,共70个牙位。喷砂组脱落托槽的底板采用喷砂法进行处理,磨除组脱落托槽的底板采用磨除法进行处理,比较两组治疗期间的托槽脱落率。结果两组的脱落率虽然不相同,但是经过χ2检验,各项指标互相比较P>0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论喷砂法可以尽量减少对托槽的损伤,黏结效果相对优于磨除法,因此在正畸临床中应优先选择喷砂法。
作者 张旭
出处 《中国医药指南》 2012年第10期170-171,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

  • 1牛宏,金作林,段银钟.托槽重复黏结及不同处理方法对抗剪强度的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(3):408-410. 被引量:13
  • 2Tavares SW, Consani S, Nouer DF. Shear bond strength of new and recycled brackets to enamel [J] . Braz Dent J, 2006, 17 (1) : 44-48.
  • 3Quick AN, Harris AM, Joseph VP. Office reconditioning of stainless steel orthodontic attachments [J] . Eur J Orthod, 2005, 27 (3) : 231-236.
  • 4Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, et al. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive [J] . Angle Orthod, 2000, 70 (6) : 435-441.
  • 5Zachrisson BU. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod, 1977,71 ( 2 ) : 173 -174.
  • 6陈治清,管利民.口腔粘着学.北京:北京医科大学.中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1993.36.
  • 7Cartensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am J Orthod, 1986,89( 1 ) :70-71.
  • 8Graf I, Jacobi BE. Bond strength of various fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding systems. Experimental study. J Orofac Orthop, 2000,61 (3) :191-198.
  • 9Mulcaney K, Caputo AA, Duperon DF. In vitro bracket bond strength to acid-etched or air-abraded enamel Pediatr Dent, 1999,21 (4) : 281-284.
  • 10陈振琦,彭适生.托槽直接粘接技术及其相关因素[J].上海口腔医学,1997,6(4):235-238. 被引量:6

共引文献25

同被引文献48

  • 1石东晓,陈杰,刘王君.喷砂技术对牙釉质和正畸托槽间黏结强度的影响[J].广东牙病防治,2007,15(4):155-157. 被引量:6
  • 2Newman GV .Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attach- ments: progress report[J].Am J Orthod, 1965,51 (12) :901.
  • 3Black RB. Airbrasive: some fundamentals [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1950,41 (6) : 701.
  • 4Weaks LM, Leacher NB, Barnes CM, et al. Clinical evalu- ation of the Prophy-Jet as an instrument for routine remov- al of tooth stain and plaque [J]. J Periedontol, 1984, 55 (8):486.
  • 5Keen DS, von Fraunhofer JA, Pakins FM.Air-abrasive "etching" :Composite bond strengths [ J ]. Dent Res, 1994, 73(13):238.
  • 6Cal-Neto JP, Castro S, Moura PM, et al. Influence of enamel sandblasting prior to etching on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded lingual appliances [J] .Angle Orthodontist, 2011,81 ( 1 ): 149.
  • 7Cagn Tiirkoz, Cagn Ulusoy.Evaluation of different enamel conditioning techniques for orthodontic bonding [Jl.The Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 2012,42 ( 1 ) :32.
  • 8Lucal Lombardo, DDS, Andrea Kaplan, PhD , Roberto Lapenta, PhD, et al. A comparative study of lingual brack- et bond strength [J].Scientific innovation, 2011, 12 (3): 178.
  • 9Isabel Cristina Prado Torres Lugato, Lilian Maria Brisque Pignatta, Flvia de Moraes Arantes, et al. Comparison of the shear bond strengths of conventional mesh bases and sandblasted orthodontic bracket bases [ J ]. Braz Oral Rcs, 2009,23(4):407.
  • 10Ahrari F, Basafa M, Fekrazad R, et al. The efficacy of Er, Cr:YSGG laser in recond-itioning of metallic orthodontic brackets[J] .Photomed Laser Surg, 2012,30 ( 1 ) :41.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部