期刊文献+

Variable diffusion boundary layer and diffusion flux at sediment-water interface in response to dynamic forcing over an intertidal mudflat 被引量:6

Variable diffusion boundary layer and diffusion flux at sediment-water interface in response to dynamic forcing over an intertidal mudflat
原文传递
导出
摘要 The diffusion boundary layer (DBL) significantly limits the exchange between sediment and overlying water and therefore becomes a bottleneck of diffusive vertical flux at the sediment-water interface (SWI). Variable DBL thickness and diffusion flux in response to dynamic forcing may influence replenishment of nutrients and secondary pollution in coastal waters. In situ measurements of velocity in the bottom boundary layer (BBL) and oxygen concentration in the DBL were made over an intertidal mudflat, using an acoustic Doppler current and mini profiler. A linear distributed zone in the oxygen profile, the profile slope discontinuity and variance of concentration can be used to derive accurate DBL thickness. Diffusion fluxes calculated from the water column and sediment are identical, and their bias is less than 6%. A numerical model PROFILE is used to simulate the in situ dissolved oxygen profile, and layered dissolved oxygen consumption rates in the sediment are calculated. The DBL thickness (0.10-0.35 mm) and diffusion flux (15.4-53.6 mmol m 2 d 1) vary with a factor of 3.5 during a tidal period. Over an intertidal mudflat, DBL thickness is controlled by flow speed U in the BBL, according to δDBL=1686.1DU 1+0.1 (D is the molecular diffusion coefficient). That is, the DBL thickness δDBL increases with decreasing flow speed U. Changes of diffusion flux at the SWI are caused by variations in the water above the sediment and the turbulent mixing intensity. The diffusion flux is positively related to the turbulent dissipation rate, friction velocity and turbulent energy. Under the influence of dynamics in the BBL, DBL thickness and flux vary significantly. The diffusion boundary layer (DBL) significantly limits the exchange between sediment and overlying water and therefore becomes a bottleneck of diffusive vertical flux at the sediment-water interface (SWI). Variable DBL thickness and diffusion flux in response to dynamic forcing may influence replenishment of nutrients and secondary pollution in coastal waters. In situ measurements of velocity in the bottom boundary layer (BBL) and oxygen concentration in the DBL were made over an intertidal mudflat, using an acoustic Doppler current and mini profiler. A linear distributed zone in the oxygen profile, the profile slope discontinuity and variance of concentration can be used to derive accurate DBL thickness. Diffusion fluxes calculated from the water column and sediment are identical, and their bias is less than 6%. A numerical model PROFILE is used to simulate the in situ dissolved oxygen profile, and layered dissolved oxygen consumption rates in the sediment are calculated. The DBL thickness (0.10--0.35 mm) and diffusion flux (15.4-53.6 mmol m-ad-1) vary with a factor of 3.5 during a tidal period. Over an intertidal mudflat, DBL thickness is controlled by flow speed U in the BBL, according to C^D~L= 1686.1DU-1+0.1 (D is the molecular diffusion coefficient) That is, the DBL thickness C^DBL increases with decreasing flow speed U. Changes of diffusion flux at the SWI are caused by variations in the water above the sediment and the turbulent mixing intensity. The diffusion flux is positively related to the turbulent dissipation rate, friction velocity and turbulent energy. Under the influence of dynamics in the BBL, DBL thickness and flux vary significantly.
出处 《Chinese Science Bulletin》 SCIE CAS 2012年第13期1568-1577,共10页
基金 supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB403606) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40830854 and 40806001)
关键词 扩散通量 边界层流 潮间带 水界面 泥滩 动力强迫 氧气浓度 分子扩散系数 diffusion boundary layer, diffusion flux, dynamic forcing, mini profiler, dissolved oxygen, intertidal mudflat
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1Wang Yaping,J Sedimentary Research
  • 2Gao Shu,博士学位论文
  • 3Xinyu Guo,Tetsuo Yanagi.Three-dimensional structure of tidal current in the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea[J].Journal of Oceanography.1998(6)
  • 4Lee J. C. and Jung K. T.Application of eddy viscosity closure models for the M2 tide and tidal currents in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea[].Continental Shelf Research.1999
  • 5Green M. O. and McCave I. N.Seabed drag coefficient under tidal currents in the eastern Irish Sea[].Journal of Geophysical Research.1995
  • 6StapletonK. R. and Huntley D. A.Seabed stress determination using the inertial dissipation method and the turbulent kinetic energy method[].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.1995
  • 7Dewey R. K. and Crawford G. B.Bottom stress estimates from vertical dissipation rate profiles on the continental shelf[].Journal of Physical Oceanography.1988
  • 8Fugate D. C. and Chant R. J.Near-bottom shear stresses in a small, highly stratified estuary[].Journal of Geophysical Research.2005
  • 9Huntley D. A.A modified inertial dissipation method for estimating seabed stresses at low Reynolds numbers, with application to wave/current boundary layer measurements[].Journal of Physical Oceanography.1988
  • 10Munk W. H.Once again: once again-Tidal friction[].Progress in Oceanography.1997

共引文献55

同被引文献103

引证文献6

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部