期刊文献+

支架植入对股腘动脉闭塞性病变内膜下成形术后通畅率的影响 被引量:2

The impact of stent implantation on the patency rate of femoropopliteal artery after subintimal angioplasty for occlusive arteriosclerosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用内膜下成形和(或)支架植入治疗股腘动脉闭塞性病变的临床疗效及支架植入对术后通畅率的影响。方法 2007年1月至2009年5月收治下肢股腘动脉闭塞患者43例(43条肢体),其中24例(非支架组)行单纯内膜下成形术,其余19例患者(支架组)在内膜下成形后一期行支架植术。术后行CTA或多普勒超声检查,对部分再狭窄或闭塞病变行再次介入治疗。术后随访1~27个月。结果术后12个月保肢率为98%(42/43),围手术期并发症发生率为7%(3/43),2年死亡率为7%(3/43)。随访期内22例出现再狭窄或闭塞,其中非支架组3例闭塞发生在术后1个月内;共有12条肢体行再次介入治疗。非支架组6、12和24个月的一期通畅率分别为83.3%±7.6%、74.0%±9.2%和56.1%±13.5%;支架组分别为89.5%±7.0%、77.5%±9.9%和32.2%±16.6%。非支架组12、24个月的一期辅助通畅率分别为90.9%±6.1%和64.2%±14.7%;支架组分别为94.4%±5.4%和39.0%±15.9%);支架组和非支架组整体间差异均无统计学意义P>0.05。远端血管通畅数目、股腘动脉闭塞类型和吸烟史对内膜下成形术后2年内一期通畅率有显著影响(r=-4.417,2.502,3.115;Sχ=1.627,0.955,1.523;P=0.007,0.009,0.041)。结论内膜下成形术后不必常规行支架植入;支架植入不会改善术后2年期内的通畅率;2年期内通畅率与周围血管条件密切相关,吸烟也对预后有重要影响。 Objective To assess the impact of stent implantation on the patency rate of femoropopliteal artery after subintimal angioplasty for occlusive arteriosclerosis. Methods During the period from January 2007 to May 2009, a total of 43 patients with occlusive femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis (43 diseased legs) were treated in authors' hospital. Of the 43 patients, simple percutaneous subintimal angioplasty was performed in 24 (non-stent group), while percutaneous subintimal angioplasty with subsequent stent implantation was carried out in the remaining 19 (stent group). After the treatment, CTA or Doppler ultrasonic examination was performed to check the results. Interventional therapy was repeated in some cases who developed restenosis. Results The 12-month limb salvage rate was 98%. Perioperative minor complications occurred in 7% of patients (3/43). Two-year mortality rate was 7% (3/43). During the follow-up period, arterial restenosis or occlusion occurred in 22 cases. Three cases in non-stent group developed arterial occlusion within one month after the treatment. Repeated interventional procedure was carried out for 12 diseased legs. The primary pateney rates of non-stent group at 6, 12 and 24 months were (83.3 ±7.6)%, (74.0 ± 9.2)% and (56.1 ± 13.5)%, respectively, while those of stent group were (89.5 ± 7.0)%, (77.5 ± 9.9)% and (32.2 ±16.6)%, respectively. The primary assisted patency rates at 12 and 24 months in non-stent group were (90.9 ±6.1)% and (64.2 ±14.7)%, respectively, while those in stent group were (94.4 ± 5.4)% and (39.0± 15.9)%,respectively. The differences in both the primary pateney rate and primary assisled pateney rate between the two groups were of no significance (P 〉 0.05). Cox-regression analysis indicated that the number of patent distal vessels, the type of femoropopliteal occlusive diseases and the history of smoking bore a close relationship to the two-year primary patency rate after subiatimal angioplasty (r = -4.417, 2.502, 3.115; Sv = 1.627, 0.955, 1.523; P = 0.007, 0.009, 0.041). Conclusion For the trealment o1' occlusive femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis, it is not necessary to routinely use stent implantation after subintimal angioplasty. Stent implantation will not obviously improve the two-year primary pateney rale. The patency of the distal vessels and the hislory of smoking have a very important effect on the two-year primary pateney rale.(J lntervent Radiol, 2012, 21: 278-283)
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期278-283,共6页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
基金 江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK2010395)
关键词 股腘动脉闭塞性病变 内膜下成形术 支架 介入治疗 femoropopliteal occlusive arteriosc]erosis: subintimal angioplasty stent inlerventional therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Bolia A, Brennan J, Bell PR. Recanalisation of femoro-popliteal occlusions: improving success rate by subintimal recanalisation [J]. Clin Radiol, 1989, 40: 325.
  • 2肖亮,申景,黄德生,童家杰,张曦彤,徐克.糖尿病下肢动脉阻塞性病变介入治疗疗效分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,20(3):218-223. 被引量:13
  • 3Schwarzwalder U, Zeller T. Below-the-knee revascularization. Advanced techniques [J]. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2009,50:627 - 634.
  • 4Rand T, Lammer J, Rabbia C, angioplasty versus turbostati infrapopliteal arteries : InPeria 261 : 634 - 642. et al. Percutaneous transluminal c carbon-coated stents in Ⅱ trial [J]. Radiology, 2011,.
  • 5Ko YG, Shin S, Kim KJ, et al. Efficacy of stent-supported subintimal angioplasty in the treatment of long iliae artery occlusions[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 54:116 - 122.
  • 6Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus bare nitinol stent for obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: the SIROCCO II trial[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005, 16: 331 - 338.
  • 7Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, et al. Drug-eluting and bare nitinol stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery: long-term results from the SIROCCO trial[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2006, 13:701 - 710.
  • 8Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354:1879 - 1888.
  • 9Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, et al. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting[J]. Circulation, 2007, 115: 2745 - 2749.
  • 10楼文胜,顾建平,何旭,陈亮,陈国平,苏浩波,宋进华,汪涛,徐克.内膜下成形术治疗股浅动脉长段闭塞[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,20(10):773-777. 被引量:8

二级参考文献33

  • 1Eschwege E, SimonD, Balkau B. The growing burden of diabetes in the world population [J]. International Diabetes Federation Bulletin, 1997, 42: 14- 19.
  • 2Jude EB, Oyibo SO, Chalmers N, et al. Peripheral arterial disease in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: a comparison of severity and outcome [J]. Diabetes Care, 2001, 24: 1433 - 1437.
  • 3DeRubertis BG, Pierce M, Ryer EJ, et al. Reduced primary pateney rate in diabetic patients after percutaneous intervention results from more frequent presentation with limb-threatening ischemia[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 47(1): 101 - 108.
  • 4Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB, for the TASC Working Group. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) [J]. J Vasc Surg,2000, 31 : S241 - 296.
  • 5Muluk SC, Muluk VS, Kelley ME, et al. Outcome events in patients with claudication: a 15 year study in 2777 patients[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 33:251 - 258.
  • 6Dietzek AM, Gupta SK, Kram HB,et al. Limb loss with patent infra-inguinal bypasses [J]. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1990, 4:413 - 417.
  • 7Goshima KR, Mills JL Sr, Hughes JD. A new look at outcomes after infrainguinal bypass surgery: traditional reporting standards systematically underestimate the expenditure of effort required to attain limb salvage[J]. J Vase Surg, 2004, 39:330 - 335.
  • 8Schneider PA, Rutherford RB. Endovascular interventions in the management of chronic lower extremity ischemia [M]. // Rutherford JB, editor. Vascular Surgery 2000. 5th edition. Philadelphia, PA.. W.B. Sannders Co., 1058- 1059.
  • 9Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS. The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: a 10-year experience[J], J Vasc Surg, 2005, 41 : 423 - 435.
  • 10Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS. Long-term outcomes and predictors of iliac angioplasty with selective stenting[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2005, 42: 466- 475.

共引文献19

同被引文献24

  • 1康涛,李晓强,唐军建,钱爱民,孟庆友.内膜下血管成形术治疗股腘动脉硬化闭塞症[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2012,4(2):79-82. 被引量:8
  • 2徐克,于世平,苏洪英,张曦彤,赵钟春,冯博,钟红珊.主-髂-股动脉闭塞性病变介入治疗的技术探讨及疗效观察[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(4):383-387. 被引量:51
  • 3Hynes N , Akhtar Y, Manning B, et al. Subintimal angioplasty as a primary modality in the management of critical limb ischemia: com?parison to bypass grafting for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal occlusive disease. J Endovasc Ther ,2004,11 :460.
  • 4Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Ceken K, et al. Subintimal recanalization of long superlicial femoral artery occlusions through the retrograde popliteal approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ,2001,24: 154.
  • 5Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised con- trolled trial. Lancet, 2005 ,366 : 1925.
  • 6Bradbury A, Wilmink T, Lee AJ, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty to treat severe limb ischemia: Factors that affect treatment preferences of UK surgeons and interventional radiologists. J Vase Surg, 2004 , 39:1026.
  • 7Laxdal E, Jenssen GL, Pedersen G, et al. Subintimal angioplasty as a treatment of femoropopliteal artery occlusions. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg,2003,25:578.
  • 8Cejna M, Thurnher S, Illiasch H, et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent placement in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: a multicenter pro?spective randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol ,2001,12 :23.
  • 9Grenacher L,Saam T ,Geier A,et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent place?ment in femoropopliteal artery stenoses: results of a multicenter pro?spective randomized study (REFSA). Rofo,2004, 176: 1302.
  • 10Antusevas A, Aleksynas N, Kaupsa RS, et al. Comparison of results of subintimal angioplasty and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superlicial femoral artery occulusions. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg, 2008,36: 101.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部