期刊文献+

VEGF 在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及临床意义 被引量:15

VEGF Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Its Clinical Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨VEGF在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及临床意义。方法:选取天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院2007年11月至2008年6月间560例乳腺癌,用免疫组织化学方法检测肿瘤组织VEGF的表达状态,分析其与各临床病理特征的关系,以及在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达和预后作用。结果:乳腺癌患者中VEGF的阳性表达率为36.1%(202/560),其中三阴性乳腺癌中阳性表达率为45.0%(49/109),明显高于非三阴组33.9%(P=0.031)。VEGF的表达与患者年龄、肿瘤部位、病理类型、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、病理分期、组织学分级和p53状态均无明显相关(P>0.05),但在低年龄组(66.7%vs.41.7%)、淋巴结转移组(51.1%vs.37.1%)和p53阳性组(51.8%vs.34.0%)方面发现VEGF表达有增多的趋势。三阴性乳腺癌VEGF阳性者较阴性者易发生复发和转移(23.9%vs.9.7%),3年无疾病复发率明显低于VEGF阴性组(76.6%vs.90.3%,P=0.044)。结论:VEGF可以作为三阴性乳腺癌影响复发的预后因素之一,有可能成为三阴性乳腺癌靶向治疗的研究靶点。 Objective: The current study aims to investigate the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor ( VEGF ) in triple-negative breast cancer ( TNBC ) and its relationship with the prognosis. Methods: The medical records of 560 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between November 2007 and June 2008 were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the VEGF expression in TNBC patients and to analyze the relationship be- tween VEGF expression with clinicopathologic characteristics and the prognostic value. Results: The VEGF positive rate was 36.1% in all of the breast cancer cases ( 202 / 560 ). Moreover, the VEGF expression was significantly higher in TNBC cases than in non-TN- BC cases ( 45 % versus 33.9 %, P = 0.031 ). No significant correlation was observed between the different VEGF expression levels and patients' age, tumor location, histology, tumor size, lymph node, pathological stage, histology grade, or p53 ( P 〉 0.05 ). The VEGF pos- itive rate was higher in younger ( 66.7 % versus 41.7 % ), lymph node-positive ( 51.1 % versus 37.1% ), and p53-positive ( 51.8 % ver- sus 34.0 % ) patients. However, the differences were insignificant. Moreover, TNBC patients with positive VEGF expression were more prone to relapse and metastasis ( 23.9 % versus 9.7 % ). The 3-year disease-free relapse ( DFR ) rate was lower in VEGF-positive pa- tients than in VEGF-negative patients ( 76.6 % versus 90.3 %, P = 0.044 ). Conclusion: VEGF is one of the predictive factors for the DFR rate of TNBC patients, which could be an important research topic for future studies.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期439-442,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词 VEGF 三阴性乳腺癌 预后 Vascular endothelial growth factor ( VEGF ) Triple-negative breast cancer ( TNBC ) Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bauer KR,Brown M,Cress RD,et al.Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative,progesterone receptor (PR)-negative,and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer,the so-called triple-negative phenotype:a population-based study from the California cancer Registry[J].Cancer,2007,109(9):1721-1728.
  • 2Cleator S,Heller W,Coombes RC.Triple-negative breast cancer:therapeutic options[J].Lancet Oncol,2007,8(3):235-244.
  • 3Rakha EA,El-Sayed ME,Green AR,et al.Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer[J].Cancer,2007,109(1):25-32.
  • 4Haffty BG,Yang Q,Reiss M,et al.Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2006,24(36):5652-5657.
  • 5Dent R,Trudeau M,Pritchard KI,et al.Triple-negative breast cancer:clinical features and patterns of recurrence[J].Clin Cancer Res,2007,13(15Pt1):4429-4434.
  • 6Shivakumar S,Prabhakar BT,Jayashree K,et al.Evaluation of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density(MVD) as prognostic indicators in carcinoma breast[J].J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2009,135 (4):627-636.
  • 7Linderholm B,Tavelin B,Grankvist K,et al.Vascular endothelial growth factor is of high prognostic value in node-negative breast carcinoma[J].J Clin Oncol,1998,16(9):3121-3128.
  • 8Kowanetz M,Ferrara N.Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathways:therapeutic perspective[J].Clin Cancer Res,2006,12 (17):5018-5022.
  • 9Linderholm BK,Hellborg H,Johansson U,et al.Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer[J].Ann Oncol,2009,20(10):1639-1646.
  • 10Jobim FC,Schwartsmann G,Xavier NL,et al.Expression of MMP-9 and VEGF in breast cancer:correlation with other prognostic indicators[J].Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet,2008,30(6):287-293.

二级参考文献34

  • 1赵卫红,徐兵河,张频,李青,赵龙妹,孙燕.乳腺癌合并脉管瘤栓的临床病理特点及预后因素分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(2):137-140. 被引量:14
  • 2Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA, 2006, 295:2492-2502.
  • 3Carlson RW, Moench SJ, Hammond ME, et al. HER2 testing in breast cancer: NCCN Task Force report and recoannendations. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2006, 4 Suppl 3 :S1-22.
  • 4Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes RC. Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol, 2007, 8:235-244.
  • 5Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer, 2007, 109:25-32.
  • 6Perez EA, Roche PC, Jenkins RB, et al. HER2 testing in patients with breast cancer: poor correlation between weak positivity by immunohistochemistry and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mayo Clin Proc, 2002, 77:148-154.
  • 7Kandel MJ, Stadler Z, Masciari S, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in triple negative breast cancer (BC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2006, 24 :abstr 508.
  • 8Herr A, Gluz O, Ting E, et al. Biological characteristics in triple negative high risk breast cancer and their clinical implications. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2006, 24 : abstr 20032.
  • 9Livasy CA, Karaca G, Nanda R, et al. Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol, 2006, 19:264-271.
  • 10Banerjee S, Reis-Fliho JS, Ashley S, et al. Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy. J Clin Pathol, 2006, 57:729-735.

共引文献206

同被引文献133

引证文献15

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部