期刊文献+

急诊介入与溶栓治疗对急性心肌梗死疗效的比较 被引量:14

Comparison of therapeutic effects on acute myocardial infarction between primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与静脉溶栓治疗对急性心肌梗死(AMI)的疗效。方法:2006年1月至2010年6月间收治的60例AMI病人被分为:PCI组(30例),静脉溶栓组(30例);比较两组的ST回落情况,再通率,死亡率,主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率和心功能情况。结果:与静脉溶栓组比较,PCI组ST回落明显,ST仍抬高的水平明显较低(0.17±0.09)mV比(0.03±0.02)mV;与静脉溶栓组比较,PCI组30d内死亡率(10%比3.3%),MACE发生率(23.3%比10%)明显降低,梗死相关血管再通率(53.3%比96.7%)明显提高,心功能明显改善[左室舒张末内径(51.8±5.8)mm比(45.7±6.6)mm,左室射血分数(45.2±7.7)%比(52.1±5.5)%],P均<0.01。结论:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能及时有效地开通梗死相关动脉挽救濒死的心肌,改善心功能,降低死亡率,是治疗急性心肌梗死的首选方法。 Objective: To compare therapeutic effects of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) and intravenous thrombolytic therapy on acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods:A total of 60 AMI patients admitted from Jan 2006 to Jun 2010 were divided into PCI group(n=30) and intravenous thrombolysis group(n=30).Comparison were performed on regression of ST segment(∑ST),recanalization rate,mortality rate,incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)and cardiac function in the two groups.Results:Regression of ST segment in PCI group was significantly more than that of intravenous thrombolysis group,remain ∑ST[(0.03±0.02) vs.(0.17±0.09)];Compared with intravenous thrombolysis group,there were significant decrease in mortality rate within 30 d(10% vs.3.3%) and MACE incidence rate(23.3% vs.10%),significant increase in recanalization rate of infarct-related artery(53.3% vs.96.7%) and significant improvements in cardiac function [left ventricular end-diastolic dimension:(51.8±5.8) mm vs.(45.7±6.6) mm,left ventricular ejection fraction:(45.2±7.7)% vs.(52.1±5.5)%]in PCI group,P0.01 all.Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention can effectively open infarct-related artery in time,save agonal myocardium,improve cardiac function and lower mortality rate.It's a preferred method for treatment of acute myocardial infarction.
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第2期172-174,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 心肌梗塞 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 血栓溶解疗法 Myocardial infarction Angioplasty transluminal percutaneous coronary Thrombolytic therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献23

  • 1钱志贤,葛雷,钱菊英,樊冰,王灏,周京敏,冯琪,葛均波.急诊PTCA与溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死近期疗效对比研究[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2005,14(2):131-132. 被引量:14
  • 2苏哲坦,郭桂英.溶栓疗法与抗凝剂在急性心肌梗塞中应用的经验[J].中国实用内科杂志,1996,16(2):71-72. 被引量:23
  • 3沈潞华,柯元楠,杨跃进,顾复生.全国急性心肌梗塞再灌注治疗研讨会纪要[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):323-327. 被引量:97
  • 4急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 5Lee K L, Woodlief L H,Topol E J,et al. Predictors of 30 -day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction: results from an international trial of 41 021 patients:GUSTO - I investigators[J]. Circulation, 1995,91 :1659 - 1668.
  • 6Brener S J, Ellis S G, Sapp S K,et al. Predictors of death and reinfarction at 30 days after primary angioplasty:the gusto Ⅱ b and rapport trials[J]. Am Heart J, 2000,139: 476 - 481.
  • 7Benhorin J,Moss A J,Oakes D,et al. Prognostic significance of nonfatal myocardial reinfarction [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990,15 :253 -259.
  • 8Burns R J, Gibbons R J, Yi Q, et al. The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction, end -systolic volume index and infarct size to six- month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis [J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,39 : 30 - 36.
  • 9Bode C,Smalling R W, Sen S,et al. Recombinant plasminogen activator angiographic phase Ⅱ international dose finding study ( RAPID ): patency analysis and mortality endpoints [J].Circulation,1993,88(Suppl I :292-301.
  • 10Elad Y,French W J,Shavelle D M,et al. Primary angioplasty and selection bias in patients presenting later (>12 h) after onset of chest pain and ST elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,39 : 826 - 833.

共引文献4984

同被引文献108

引证文献14

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部