期刊文献+

男性静止期尿道压力测定中测压灌注速度与测压管牵引速度较优组合的研究 被引量:1

Optimum Combination of Manometric Perfusion Speed and Manometric Tube Traction Speed in Male Resting Urethral Pressure Measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在静止期尿道压力测定中测压灌注速度、测压管牵引速度2个参数的较优组合。方法对30例前列腺增生症患者采用尿动力学分析仪及选定4组测压灌注速度、测压管牵引速度的参数组合(1mL.min-1、1mm.s-1,1mL.min-1、2mm.s-1,2mL.min-1、1mm.s-1,2mL.min-1、2mm.s-1)行静止期尿道压力测定,并对最大尿道压(max urethral pressure,MUP)、最大尿道闭合压(max closure pressure,MCP)以析因设计的F检验进行统计分析。结果 30例患者中,测压灌注速度、测压管牵引速度参数组合分别为1 mL.min-1、1mm.s-1,1mL.min-1、2mm.s-1,2mL.min-1、2mm.s-1时MUP、MCP压力值均明显低于测压灌注速度、测压管牵引速度参数组合为2mL.min-1、1mm.s-1时,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论不同的测压灌注速度、测压管牵引速度的组合对静止期尿道压力测定结果有明显的影响,以测压灌注速度2mL.min-1、测压管牵引速度1mm.s-1测得静止期尿道压力为较优组合。 Objective To explore the optimum combination of manometric perfusion speed and manometric tube traction speed in male resting urethral pressure measurement.Methods The resting urethral pressure was measured with urodynamic analyzer in 30 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.The manometric perfusion speed and manometric tube traction speed consisted of 4 parameter combinations(1 mL·min-1and 1 mm·s-1;1 mL·min-1and 2 mm·s-1;2 mL·min-1and 1 mm·s-1;2 mL·min-1and 2 mm·s-1).Max urethral pressure(MUP) and max closure pressure(MCP)were analyzed statistically using F-test.Results The parameter combination of 1 mL·min-1and 1 mm·s-1,1 mL·min-1and 2 mm·s-1,or 2 mL·min-1and 2 mm·s-1 leaded to significant decrease in values of MUP and MCP,compared with the combination of 2 mL·min-1and 1 mm·s-1(all P0.05).Conclusion Different combinations of manometric perfusion speed and manometric tube traction speed have obvious effects on resting urethral pressure measurement,and the optimum combination is 2 mL·min-1 of manometric perfusion speed and 1 mm·s-1 of manometric tube traction speed.
出处 《南昌大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2012年第2期20-22,共3页 Journal of Nanchang University:Medical Sciences
基金 江西省卫生厅科技计划(20071008)
关键词 尿动力学 尿道压力测定 静止期 测压灌注速度 测压管牵引速度 前列腺增生症 男性 Urodynamics urethral pressure measurement resting stage manometric perfusion speed manometric tube traction speed benign prostatic hyperplasia male
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献34

  • 1文建国.尿动力学检查在女性尿失禁诊断中的应用[J].中华妇产科杂志,2004,39(10):717-720. 被引量:40
  • 2李涛,谢克基,汤平,姜少军,曾健文,潘朝杰.良性前列腺增生膀胱出口梗阻的评估[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2007,27(3):297-299. 被引量:6
  • 3Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, et al. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four europan ountries[J]. BJU Int,2004,93:324-330.
  • 4Karantanis E, Fynes M, Moore KH,et al. Comparison of the ICIQ-SF and 24-hour pad test with other measures for evaluating the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence[J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2004,15:111-116.
  • 5Paick JS, Ku JH, Shin JW, et al. Significance of pad test loss for the evaluation of women with urinary incontinence[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2005,24239-43.
  • 6Nager CW, Schulz JA, Stanton SL,et al. Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures[J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2001,12:395-400.
  • 7McNeal JE.The prostate gland :morphology and pathology. Monogr Urol, 1988,9:36-42.
  • 8Kiptoon DK, Magoha GA, Owillah FA. Early postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing prostateetomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi.East Afr Med J, 2007, 84 (9 Supp 1) : S40-S44.
  • 9Marks LS, Roehrborn CG, Wolford E, et al. The effect of dutas teride an the peripheral and transition zones of the prostate and the value of the transition zone index in predicting treatment response. J Urol, 2007, 177: 1408-1413.
  • 10Roehrborn CG. BPH progression: concept and key learning from MTOPS, ALTESS, COMBAT, and ALF2ONE. BJU Int, 2008, 101 (Suppl 3): 17-21.

共引文献41

同被引文献11

  • 1刘志敏,郭骏,潘铁军.静态尿道压力测量在诊断BPH所致膀胱出口梗阻中的作用[J].临床外科杂志,2003,11(S1):29-31. 被引量:2
  • 2苏静,文建国,魏振玲,王庆伟,刘奎,张鹏.女性压力性尿失禁严重程度与尿动力学参数的相关性分析[J].山东医药,2006,46(1):18-19. 被引量:14
  • 3陈潜,孙莉生,时俊伟.前列腺增生患者尿动力学检测的临床意义[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(10):774-775. 被引量:8
  • 4何有华,陈映鹤,竺海波,张磊,陈志勇,杨世坤,饶大庞,虞海锋.前列腺增生症患者静态尿道测压指标的变化及意义[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(8):1185-1186. 被引量:1
  • 5Kahokehr A, Vather R, Nixon A, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammato- ry drugs for lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasi- a: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trims [J]. BJU Int, 2013, 111(2): 304-311.
  • 6Dmochowski R R. Bladder outlet obstruction: etiology and evaluation [J]. Rev Urol, 2005, 7 Suppl 6:$3-S13.
  • 7Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing-Part 2: uro- flowmetry [J]. Urol Nurs, 2010, 30(6) : 321 -326.
  • 8Valentini F A, Robain G, Marti B G. Is a sequence of tests during u- rethral pressure profilometry correlated with symptoms assessment in women? [J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2012, 38(6) : 809 -817.
  • 9Belal M, Abrams P. Noninvasive methods of diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in men. Part 1 : Nonurodynamic approach [ J ]. J Urol, 2006, 176(1) : 22 -28.
  • 10Oelke M. International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS) report on non-invasive urodynamics : the need of standardiza- tion of ultrasound bladder and detrusor wall thickness measurements to quantify bladder wall hypertrophy [ J ]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2010, 29 (4) : 634 -639.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部