期刊文献+

系统重要性机构识别和监管研究综述

An overview on identifying and regulating systemically important financial institutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2008年国际金融危机与以往危机最大的不同在于危机肇始于著名跨国金融机构的倒闭。通过对危机进行反思,二十国集团要求确保所有具有系统重要性的金融机构、市场和工具受到适当的监管和监督。该文从国际监管组织提出的“系统重要性金融机构”的概念出发,介绍了系统重要性机构的识别方法,以及当前有关强化系统重要性机构监管的国际实践,并对降低我国系统重要性金融机构的风险提出了政策建议。 The 2008 international financial crisis and past crises differed greatly as the 2008 crisis began from the collapse of well-known multinational institutions. Through reflections on the crisis, G20 required that all systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs), markets and instruments should be subject to proper regulation and oversight. This article starts from SIFIs concept put forward by international regulatory organizations, introduces the identification methods of SIFIs, reviews the international practice to strengthen SIFIs supervision, and makes some suggestions to reduce the risks from SIFIs in China.
作者 陈静
出处 《中国货币市场》 2012年第4期33-37,共5页 China Money
关键词 系统重要性 系统性风险 大而不能倒 监管 systemic importance, systematic risk, too-big-tofail, regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Nikola A, Tarashev, Claudio E. V. Borio, Kostas Tsatsaronis. The Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions. BIS Quarterly Review, 2009.
  • 2Nikola A. Tarashev Claudio E. V. Borio, Kostas Tsatsaronis. Attributing Systemic Risk to Individual Institutions. BIS Working Paper No. 308, 2010.
  • 3Dean Baker. Travis McArthur. The Value of the "Too Big to Fail" Big Bank Subsidy. http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/too-big-to-fail-subsidy, 2009.
  • 4FSB. Intensity and Effectiveness of SIFI Supervision. http:// www.financialstabilityboard.org, 2010.
  • 5IMF, BIS, FSB. Report to G20 Financial Ministers and Governors, Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instruments: Initial Considerations, 2009.
  • 6中国人民银行金融稳定分析小组.中国金融稳定报告.北京:中国金融出版社,2011.
  • 7毛奉君.系统重要性金融机构监管问题研究[J].国际金融研究,2011(9):78-84. 被引量:41

二级参考文献10

  • 1刘春航.关于系统性金融风险的一些思考.银行业监管研究,2011,.
  • 2Dean, B.Travis, M.The Value of the "Too Big to Fail" Big Bank Subsidy[J]. Center for Economic and Policy Research Issue Brief, September 2009.
  • 3Elijah, Brewer.Julapa, J.How Much Would Banks Be Willing to Pay to Become "Too Big to Fail" and Capture Other Benefits [R]. The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Research Department Research Working Paper 07-05.
  • 4FCIC. Governmental Rescues of "Too-Big-to-Fail" Financial Institutions [R]. FCIC Preliminary Staff Report, September 2010.
  • 5FCIC. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report [EB/OL]. http://www.fcic.gov/report.January 2011.
  • 6FSB. Intensity and Effectiveness of SIFI Supervision [R]. November 2010.
  • 7FSB. Reducing The Moral Hazard Posed by Systemically Important Financial Institutions [R]. October 2010.
  • 8FSB, IMF, BIS.Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instruments: Initial Considerations [R]. Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Governors, October 2009.
  • 9Michael, W.Does Banks' Size Distort Market Prices? Evidence for Too-big-to-fail in the CDS Market[R]. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper No. 06/2009.
  • 10王家强,彭继伟.全球银行业版图的历史变迁、决定因素及启示——兼评2010年全球1000家大银行排行榜[J].国际金融研究,2010(10):53-63. 被引量:8

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部