期刊文献+

三种脱敏剂对全酸蚀粘结剂牙本质粘结强度和界面形态的影响 被引量:3

Effect of three different desensitizers on bond strength and interface of total-etch adhesives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究、比较三种脱敏剂对全酸蚀粘结剂牙本质粘结强度及其粘结界面形态的影响。方法:选择12个无龋损离体人磨牙,磨除牙合面釉质,用600目碳化硅砂纸在流水下预备出有统一玷污层的牙本质粘结面后,随机分为4组,分别用去离子水(对照组)和3种脱敏剂(Hybrid Coat、Gluma、极固宁)进行脱敏处理后,应用Single Bond 2在面粘结4 mm树脂。然后将每个牙垂直于粘结面切割出12个1.0 mm×1.0 mm×4.0 mm的粘结试件,分别在SEM下观察其粘结界面微观形态并进行微拉伸强度(μTBS)测试。结果:HybridCoat组粘结强度最高((14.81±3.87)MPa,随后依次为去离子水组(13.39±4.67)MPa、Gluma组(12.76±2.96)MPa和极固宁组(10.48±4.32)MPa,各组间两两比较,极固宁组明显低于其他3组(P﹤0.05),其他3组间相比均无显著性差异(P﹥0.05);Hybrid Coat组形成的树脂突大部分>35μm,长而密集;Gluma组形成的树脂突长7~35μm;极固宁组形成的树脂突长20~35μm,较稀疏。结论:Hybrid Coat和Gluma对全酸蚀粘结剂牙本质粘结强度无明显影响,而极固宁则明显降低其粘结强度。 AIM: To evaluate the bond strength of total-etch adhesives after using three different dentin desensitizers on exposed dentin and investigate the bond interface by scanning electron microscope(SEM).METHODS: Superficial occlusal dentin of 12 molars was finished with 600-grit SiC paper under running water.Control(deionized water) and three dentin desensitizers(Hybrid Coat,Gluma and Green or) were applied to dentin surfaces according to the manufacturers' instructions.Then Single Bond 2 was applied and a block of composite resin was built up.The bonded teeth were sectioned occluso-gingivally into 1.0 ×1.0×4.0 mm serial slabs which were prepared for μTBS test and SEM.RESULTS: Significant differences in bond strength were observed among the four groups(P﹤0.05).Hybrid Coat exhibited the highest bond strength at(14.81±3.87)MPa,then turned to the control group(13.39±4.67)MPa,Gluma(12.76±2.96) MPa and Green or(10.48±4.32)MPa.Most of the resin tags for Hybrid Coat were longer than 35μm.Gluma showed resin tags about 7-35μm long.Green or showed resin tags about 20-35μm long.CONCLUSION: Hybrid Coat and Gluma had no effect on bond strength of total-etch adhesives.while Green or could diminish bond strength.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第4期227-230,共4页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81130078) 陕西省科学技术研究发展计划资助项目(2011K12-04-03)
关键词 牙本质 脱敏剂 微拉伸强度 扫描电镜 dentin desensitizer microtensile bond strength SEM
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation [ J ]. lnt J Prosthodont, 1991, g ( 3 ) : 219 - 225.
  • 2张怀勤,巢永烈.脱敏性粘接材料预防活髓基牙过敏的研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2005,23(2):130-132. 被引量:5
  • 3陈增力,赵文峰,胡静.脱敏治疗对活髓牙烤瓷修复后牙髓反应影响的研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2010,11(5):282-284. 被引量:8
  • 4Huh JB, Kim JH, Shim JS, et al. The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting ce- ment using self-etching primer [ J ]. J Dent, 2008,36 ( 12 ) : 1025 - 1032.
  • 5Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH, et al. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns u- sing standardized crown preparations [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 2000, 83(4) : 459 -465.
  • 6Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, et al. The resin-coating tech- nique. Effect of a single-step bonding system on dentin bond strengths [J]. JAdhes Dent, 2003, 5(4) : 293 -300.
  • 7Cilli R, Prakki A, Pereira JC. Influence of glutaraldehyde prim- ing on bond strength of an experimental adhesive system applied to wet and dry dentine [J]. JDent, 2009, 37(3) : 212 -218.
  • 8Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin [J]. Dent Mater, 1992, 8(2): 125-130.
  • 9Omae M, Inoue M, Yoshiyama M, et al. Effect of a desensiti- zing agent containing glutaraldehyde and HEMA on bond strength to Er: YAG laser- irradiated dentine [ J ]. J Dent, 2007, 35(5) : 398 -402.
  • 10Seara SF, Erthal BS, Ribeiro M, et al. The influence of a den- tin desensitizer on the micro-tensile bond strength of two bonding systems [J]. Oper Dent, 2002, 27(2): 154- 160.

二级参考文献19

  • 1程辉,郑志强,程祥荣.缓解牙体预备后活髓基牙牙本质敏感的方法研究进展[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2005,32(3):227-229. 被引量:3
  • 2陈南燕.不同脱敏方法治疗牙本质过敏症的比较研究[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2005,3(2):68-70. 被引量:9
  • 3张成飞,林琼光,曹采方,王勤.脉冲Nd:YAG激光照射牙本质对牙髓的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,1996,10(1):20-22. 被引量:14
  • 4于玲,刘静明,朱正宏,王静.三种脱敏剂治疗牙本质过敏症的临床疗效观察[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2007,21(2):113-115. 被引量:25
  • 5Cheung GS, Lai SC, Nq RP. Fate of vital pulp s beneath a metal-ceramic crown or a bridge retainer[J]. Int Endod J, 2005, 38 (8): 521 - 530.
  • 6Ito K, Nishikeate J, Murai S. Effects of Nd: YAG laser irradiation on removal of a root surface smear layer after root planing: a scanning electron microscopic study [J]. J Periodontol, 1993, 64:547-552.
  • 7Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1991, 4(3) :219-225.
  • 8Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp[J]. J Oral Pathol,1982, 11(6) :439-450.
  • 9Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures [ J ]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1997, 17(6):536-545.
  • 10Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Nunez LJ, et al. Permeability characteristics of bovine and human dentin under different pretreatment conditions[ J ].J Endod, 2001, 27(1):23-30.

共引文献11

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部