4Tao Zhang,David Zhang.Agent-based Simulation of Consumer Purchase Decision-making and the Decoy Effect[].Journal of Business.2007
5Huber Joel,Payne John W,Puto Christopher.Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis[].Journal of Consumer Research.1982
6Haubl G,Trifts V.Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids[].Marketing Science.2000
7D. Ariely.Predictably Irrational[]..2008
二级参考文献39
1Amir, O., & Levav, J. (2008). Choice construction versus preference construction: The instability of preferences learned in context. Journal of Marketing Research, 4, 145-158.
2Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An exploration of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision, 63, 223-232.
3Chang, C., & Liu, H. (2008). Information format-option characteristics compatibility and the compromise effect, Psychology & Marketing, 25, 881-900.
4Chernev, A. (2005). Context effects without a context: Attribute balance as a reason for choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 213-223.
5Chuang, S. C., & Yen, H. R. (2007). The impact of a products country-of-origin on compromise and attraction effects. Marketing Letters, 18, 279-291.
6Dhar, R., Menon, A., & Maach, B. (2004). Toward extending the compromise effect to complex buying contexts. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 258-261.
7Duncan, J., & Glyn, W. H. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
8Frederick, S., & Lee L. (2008). Attraction, repulsion, and attribute representation. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 1-2.
9Gunasti, K., William T., & Ross, Jr. (2008). Achieving the compromise effect with missing attribute information: ilntroducing shadow options. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 748-749.
10Ha, Y. W., Park, S., & Ahn, H. K. (2004). When the attraction effect disappears: The differential impact of adding common versus unique features on consumer choice. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 37-38.
