期刊文献+

基于群体语义信息的顾客需求重要度确定方法 被引量:4

Importance determining method of customer requirements based on group semantic information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为系统化地分析顾客需求的相对重要性,提出一种利用产品规划质量屋中的竞争性信息及卡诺模型调整顾客需求基本重要度的方法。首先,利用基于语言信息的决策理论进行竞争性评价和群体语义信息集结,根据集结结果构建均方差最大化模型并设定顾客满意度改进目标,获得顾客需求的竞争性重要度和改进优先度;其次,由顾客满意度双因素分析法识别顾客需求的卡诺分类并估计卡诺因子;最后,通过竞争性重要度、改进优先度和卡诺因子三者对顾客需求基本重要度进行修正,获得顾客需求综合重要度。通过某工业除尘机的改进设计实例证明了该方法的现实性和合理性。 To analyze the relative importance of customer requirement systematically,a new method by integrating market competitive information in product planning house of quality and Kano model to adjust the fundamental importance of customer requirements was proposed.The semantic information based decision-making theory was introduced to conduct competitive evaluation and aggregate group semantic information.On the basis of the results,the mean square deviation maximum model was contrusted,and goal performance level of customers satisfaction was improved.Thus the competitive importance as well as improved priority were obtained.The customer requirement's Kano classification was identified through double factor analysis of customer satisfaction and Kano factors were estimated.The basic importance of customer requirement was modified by competitive importance,improved priority,and Kano factors,and the integrated importance of customer requirements was determined.A certain industrial dust collection machine's improved design was taken as an example to demonstrate the rationality and validity of proposed method.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期840-848,共9页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971017) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(Y1100854) 教育部人文社科青年基金资助项目(12YJCZH065)~~
关键词 产品规划质量屋 顾客需求 群体语义信息 非均匀语言评估标度 卡诺模型 产品开发 product planning house of quality customer requirements group semantic information unbalanced linguistic labels Kano model product development
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1CHAN L K,WU M L. Quality function deployment.a litera-ture review[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2002,(03):463-497.doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00178-9.
  • 2XU J,XU X,XIE S Q. A comprehensive review on recent de-velopments in quality function deployment[J].International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management,2010,(04):457-494.
  • 3CARNEVALLI J A,MIGUEL P C. Review,analysis and clarifi-cation of the literature on QFD--types of research,difficulties and benefits[J].International Journal of Productions Economics,2008,(02):737-754.
  • 4KWONG C K,BAI H. Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach[J].IIE Transactions,2003,(07):619-626.doi:10.1080/07408170304355.
  • 5王美清,唐晓青.产品设计中的用户需求与产品质量特征映射方法研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(5):136-140. 被引量:75
  • 6车阿大;杨明顺.质量功能配置理论及应用[M]北京:电子工业出版社,2008.
  • 7GUINTA L R,PRAIZLER N C. The QFD book:the team ap-proach to solving problems and satisfying customers through quality function deployment[M].New York,N.Y,USA:Amacom,1993.
  • 8李延来,唐加福,姚建明,蒲云.质量功能展开中自相关关系确定的粗糙集方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(2):52-60. 被引量:5
  • 9PARK T,KIM K J. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality[J].Journal of Operations Management,1998,(05):569-581.
  • 10ERTUGRUL KARSAK E,SOVER S,EMRE ALPTEKIN S. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming ap proach[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2002,(01):171-190.

二级参考文献56

  • 1徐泽水.基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88. 被引量:66
  • 2唐加福,张艳娥,陈以增.供应商参与下的产品部件设计方案选择模型[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(5):619-624. 被引量:16
  • 3[5]Lee J W, Kim S H. Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection [J]. Computer & Operation Research, 2000,27:367~ 382
  • 4[6]Ertugrul Karsak E, Sozer S, Emre Alptekin S. Product planning in quality function development using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach [J]. Computer & Industrial Engineering, 2002,44:171 ~ 190
  • 5Sullivan L P. Quality function[J]. Quality Progress, 1986, 19(6) : 39--50.
  • 6Guinta L R, Pfizler N C. The QFD Book: The Team Approach to Solving Problems and Satisfying Customers through Quality Function Deployment[M]. New York: Amacom, 1993.
  • 7Lai K Chan, Ming L. Wu. Prioritizing the technical measures in quality function deployment[J]. Quality Engineering. 1998, 10(3) : 467--469.
  • 8Wasserman G. On how to prioritize design requirements during QFD process[J], liE Transactions, 1993, 25(3) : 59--65.
  • 9Wang J. Fuzzy outranking approach to priofitize design requirements in quality function deployment[ J]. International Journal of Production Research, 1999, 37(4) : 899--916.
  • 10Armacost R L, Componation P J, MuUens M A. AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: An industrialized housing application[J]. IIE Transaction, 1994, 26(4): 72--79.

共引文献206

同被引文献66

引证文献4

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部