期刊文献+

我国“双反”措施的产业救济效果与福利效应——基于可计算局部均衡COMPAS模型的研究 被引量:6

Industry Remedy and Welfare Effects of China's Anti-dumping and Countervailing Measures: A Research Based on COMPAS Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文利用可计算局部均衡COMPAS模型,基于2005~2009年我国鸡肉产品生产与进口的有关数据,就我国对美国白羽肉鸡产品反倾销、反补贴税的产业救济效果、福利效应等进行了实证模拟。模拟结果表明:在未来5年里,我国对美国白羽肉鸡产品的反倾销、反补贴税将使我国白羽肉鸡行业的产量和就业增加近26%,销售收入增加38.4%;但是,"双反"措施也将导致我国市场鸡肉价格大约上涨9.8%,消费量下降2.8%,消费者福利损失近10亿美元。 By using the data of production and trade of chicken products of China from 2005 to 2009 and Commercial Policy Analysis System(COMPAS) model,this paper analyses how China's anti-dumping and countervailing measures against white feather chicken products from USA would affect the production,employment and welfare at the industry level.The results of simulation show that: in the next 5 years,the implementation of anti-dumping and countervailing duties will make China's white feather chicken industry's output and employment increase by nearly 26%,sales revenue increase by 38.4%;However,the measures will also raise the chicken prices in China's market by 9.8%,and the consumption will fall by 2.8%,consumer welfare will lose by nearly 10 billion U.S.dollars.Based on the research conclusions,the paper concludes some policy recommendations.
出处 《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期1-8,共8页 Industrial Economics Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"后危机时期人民币升值的经济效应与压力测试研究"(项目编号:71103059) 国家自然科学基金项目"非市场经济地位过渡期贸易救济与投资壁垒的风险预警和效应评估"(项目编号:71073124) 教育部人文社科基金项目"当前国外对华贸易摩擦的经济效应与应对策略研究"(项目编号:10YJC790293)的资助
关键词 反倾销与反补贴措施 产业救济效果 COMPAS模型 anti-dumping and countervailing measures industry remedy effects COMPAS model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献88

共引文献221

同被引文献62

  • 1佟苍松.Armington弹性的估计与美国进口中国商品的关税政策响应分析[J].世界经济研究,2006(3):45-48. 被引量:32
  • 2卢凤喜,何敏.国内电工钢的生产现状与发展趋势[J].新技术新工艺,2006(5):73-74. 被引量:9
  • 3鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):71-84. 被引量:143
  • 4Prusa, T.J. , 1996, The Trade Effects of US Antidumping Actions, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  • 5Staiger, W. and Wolak, A. , 1994, Measuring Industry Specific Protection : Antidumping in the United States, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity : Microeconomics, Vol. 1, No. 1:60-82.
  • 6Bown, P. and Crowley, A. ,2007, "Trade Deflection and Trade Depression," Journal of International Econimics,72 ( 1 ) : 176-201.
  • 7Park,S. ,2009, "The Trade Depressing and Trade Diversion Effects of Antidumping Actions:The Case of China," China Economic Review, 20 ( 3 ) : 542-548.
  • 8Vandenbussehe, H. and Zanardi, M. , 2010, "The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation," European Eco- nomic Revknv ,54 (6) :760-777.
  • 9Pierce, R. ,2011, "Plant-level Responses to Antidumping Duties: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturers," Journal of Inter- national Economics ,85 (2) :222-233.
  • 10Francois, J. and HalI,H., 1997, Partial Equilibrium Modeling, in Francois and Reinert, eds, Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis, Cambridge :Cambridge University Press.

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部